Re: Various pkgs missing from f24 repos

On 28-06-16 03:52, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Hello ! > > On Seg, 2016-06-27 at 20:16 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > First of all many thanks to all who have been involved in getting > > the > > f24 > > repos in place. They look great and all the important pkgs are > > there. > > > > I accidentally found out that some not so important pkgs are > > missing > > though when running dnf repoquery --extras on my main workstation > > which has way too much stuff installed :) > > > > Doing this gives the following (incomplete list): > > > > -For f24 free: > >    -SheepShaver > >    -vbam > >    -madplay > >    -mock-rpmfusion-free > >    -wormsofprey > >    -xmris > >    -zsnes > > > > -For f24 nonfree: > >    -d1x > >    -doom-shareware > >    -unrar > >    -mac > >    -mock-rpmfusion-nonfree > >    -roadfighter > >    -smc-music > >    -spear-demo > >    -vice > >    -wolf4sdl > >    -xv > > > > All of these do have builds for older Fedora releases in the new > > koji, so the easiest fix likely is to simple tag these as > > f24-free-updates / f24-nonfree-updates . > > > Yes, we have to review this , I also have a list ( of dnf list > extras ) > ... > > > > > There seem to be 2 underlying problems: > > > > 1) The f24 repo did not inherit any builds from previous releases > > (assuming we want to keep the base f24 pkg set frozen we cannot > > fix > >   this now) > > > > 2) Some pkgs never got rebuild for f24, I've not checked all of > > the > > above, but for those which I've checked there are no failed f24 > > builds, > > they were likely simply never rebuild. > > > > As said for starters I think we should tag these into f24-free- > > updates / > > f24-nonfree-updates. Quite a few of the above (incomplete!) list > > are > > mine, so I will prepare f24 builds for them. > > > > I've already prepared and pushed a vice update for this, but > > rfpkg new-sources is failing for me, and as is already known > > rfpkg build does not work yet. > At least at free repo , I got some reports  that is working , > https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/repo/pkgs/free/?C=M;O=D Well it does not work for me, can you try to rfpkg clone nonfree/vice and then spectool -g *.spec, verify the downloaded sources match the md5 in the sources file, and do rfpkg new-sources (note there are 4 sources in the sources file) and see if this works for you ?

Related to this, downloading from the lookaside-cache does not work either, e.g. for vice rfpkg srpm fails with the first source, which is already in the look-a-side. If you do get this work can you please let me know: 1) which version of rfpkg you're using exactly 2) what cmdline you're using 3) if you've any local config tweaks ? > > ignatenkobrain ask to update mpg123 the source is already uploaded > !?! > this is what ignatenkobrain propose https://github.com/ascot-repo/m > pg12 > 3/blob/master/mpg123.spec > > in attach what I propose esound is obsolete, Fedora has actively been working on removing it, so we should not re-introduce deps on it, from the mpg123.spec changelog: - Drop obsolete esound and arts plugins from mpg123-plugins-extras

 > , I lost my chat log with him ... in resume, > > he removed  /sbin/alternatives since claims that we haven't any > other > alternative and also remove other spec snippets , I don't know the > impact of that, so I leave that to maintainers ( you :D ) . wrt alternatives, we had mpg321 in the past not sure if we still do, wrt the rebase to a newer version this is being tracked here: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4087 I've also left a comment there explaining why I'm in no hurry to do the rebase (it contains a bunch of major changes).

Regards, Hans