http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25
Stewart Adam <s.adam(a)diffingo.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |s.adam(a)diffingo.com
Blocks|2 |3
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #22 from Stewart Adam <s.adam(a)diffingo.com> 2009-07-03 20:59:07 ---
- source files match upstream: a17b9236a3b7b506d78fef20726294679d0a8c3f vs
0aef417dc3caf449be6117258eac1644fccec9e3
--> Please rename Source: to Source0:
+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license field matches the actual license.
? license is open source-compatible.
There are two parts of the license that worry me:
-->"Modification" means (and "modify" refers to) any alteration of
This
Product, including, [...] repackaging [...]
--> The name of ([...] modified version of This Product) must not contain the
name TrueCrypt [...] nor any other names confusingly similar to the name
TrueCrypt
Perhaps we should to contact them just to be sure? Apart from this, license
seems to be OK for redistribution and open source (but I'm not a lawyer)
+license text included in package.
+latest version is being packaged.
+BuildRequires are proper.
+ compiler flags are appropriate.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installs properly.
+ debuginfo package looks complete.
- rpmlint is silent.
truecrypt.x86_64: W: invalid-license TrueCrypt License Version 2.7
--> This is OK; TrueCrypt license isnt' recognized by rpmlint
truecrypt.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/sbin/truecrypt
--> We may wish to strip this or create a debuginfo package.
+ final provides and requires are sane
+ no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ code, not content.
+ documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
+ no headers.
+ no pkgconfig files.
+ no libtool .la droppings.
+ desktop files valid and installed properly.
The desktop file is valid, but has two warnings:
- /usr/share/applications/truecrypt.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group
"Desktop Entry" is deprecated
- /usr/share/applications/truecrypt.desktop: warning: value
"System;Application;" for key "Categories" in group "Desktop
Entry" contains a
deprecated value "Application"
Consider removing Application and Encoding from the desktop.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.