http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=740
--- Comment #21 from Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com> 2010-12-11 14:27:59 ---
(In reply to comment #20)
I am trying to CONVINCE you, but I won't ENFORCE my view.
Especially since the
rules for the license part is slightly fuzzy, since it is one area where
RPMfusion differs from Fedora. If you add "and non-commercial" to the
license,
I will accept this package, even though I personally think "Meka" or
"BSD-like"
would be better than "distributable".
I followed your advice and changed the tag to "MEKA and non-commercial".
Updates:
http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/meka.spec
http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/meka-0.73-4.fc14.src.rpm
Changelog:
- Fixed license
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.