[Bug 171] Review Request: rpmfusion-config-display - tool to manage proprietary graphic drivers
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171
--- Comment #32 from NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> 2009-01-23 13:07:34 ---
* You need to Obsoletes/Provides livna-config-display
Obsoletes: livna-config-display < 0.0.22-100
Provides: livna-config-display = 0.0.23
* The config file would deserve a .conf ( /etc/rpmfusion-config-display.conf )
* Every files the tool expect to edit will have to be owned by the package :
%ghost %{_sysconfdir}/modprobe.d/%{name}
%ghost %{_sysconfdir}/modprobe.d/ld.so.conf.d/%{name}.conf
%ghost %{_sysconfdir}/udev/makedev.d/40-%{name} (if needed)
I think previous configuration files that will conflict with the unified
configuration of closed source driver should be removed in %prep
/etc/ld.so.conf.d/nvidia*.conf , etc.
* I really don't understand wtf feature is expected from jockey:
What r-c-d primary goal is to configure the xorg.conf according to the selected
hardware driver and the way we package the driver. (in other words, configure
the xorg.ModulePath driver and ld.so.conf along with different checks).
In the opposite, jockey's aimed to discover which driver will support the given
available hardware. This has nothing to do which how the driver is been
configured. (jockey still use aticonfig and nvidia-xconfig tools IIRC)
So if someone want to package jockey, please do it in another review and make
it requires rpmfusion-config-display eventually. But rpmfusion-config-display
has nothing to do with jockey.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.