http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585
Robert Scheck <rpmfusion-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |2
--- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck <rpmfusion-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de> 2009-04-30
00:47:08 ---
Spec URL:
http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/z-push.spec
SRPM URL:
http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/z-push-1.2.1-1.src.rpm
rpmlint output:
z-push.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/z-push/state apache
z-push.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/z-push/state apache
zarafa-z-push.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/zarafa/z-push/state apache
zarafa-z-push.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/zarafa/z-push/state apache
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
Well, these directories have to be writable by the webserver user.
This is not my first package in Fedora nor do I need a sponsor.
Rest of default questions should be already satisfied with comments before.
Please understand how z-push works and why z-push and zarafa-z-push packages
are required before claiming the schema. Note, that both packages do not
exclude each else necessarily, so no conflict is needed, there are no real
overlaps.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.