Re: kmod-nvidia in rawhide?

2009/10/21 Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info&gt;: > On 21.10.2009 21:20, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> 2009/10/21 Jarod Wilson <jarod(a)wilsonet.com&gt;: >>> On Oct 21, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >>>> 2009/10/21 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik(a)greysector.net&gt;: >>>>> Could someone (Nicolas?) push nvidia's 190.40 drivers to rawhide? >>>>> I've built new RPMs locally based on latest from f11-updates and they've >>>>> been working fine for the last few days (and they work with F12's Xserver >>>>> ABI changes). >>>> Right, but the new packaging scheme is on the way. >>> New packaging scheme? /me missed something... >>>> Was delayed because the work on multimedia libs update. >>>> May I not be the only one to work on rawhide ?!!!! >>>> Please! >>> I'll take care of 190.40 drivers for rawhide right now. >> No that's not What I meant. >> >> mplayer and avidemux along with a mass rebuild is needed. >> >> Furthermore selinux still isn't compatible with the nvidia drivers yet. >> >> What You 've just subscribed is the review request pending for the new review. > > Just my 2 cent: I'd much prefer to get the driver in asap, especially if > any reviews for other packages are needed before that can happen. We are > running out of time for F12 and users are annoyed that we don't ship the > drivers. > > Or, IOW: Is there any downside in doing what Dominik and Jarod suggested > and just updated the drivers? If your new scheme gets ready in time we > can switch over easily -- we need to provide and test the upgrade path > anyway... It just

>> (nvidia-xsetting and nvidia-xconfig splitted fom the driver at least) > Weren't those reviewed earlier already? At least there is no cvs created for them.