http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1030
--- Comment #108 from Alex Lancaster <alexl(a)users.sourceforge.net> 2010-03-01
23:06:00 ---
(In reply to comment #107)
(In reply to comment #106)
> > * zlib
>
> Afaik same as with boost
The original sources use the bundled zlibs, however should already be unused
with our patches.
Right, ditto with many of the other bundles, which have been removed.
> > Finally, the following may not be appropriate for Fedora or
RPM Fusion because
> > of problematic licenses:
> >
> > * libGoAhead (Not quite sure what to make of the license, but I think this is
> > going away in the next release anyway)
>
> To confirm, latest SVN does not have libGoAhead and uses libmicrohttpd instead
This likely doesn't help us. The licening xbmc ships with its GoAhead sources
* puts us under a legal risk of being sued by GoAhead, because we are patching
GoAhead.
* Very likely invalidates xbmc's licensing, i.e. xbmc's sources very likely are
*NOT GPL'ed*.
We should just remove all the GoAhead stuff from the tarball, can we just build
the 9.11 without GoAhead at all? switching to SVN is likely to be a major pain
at this stage.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.