Re: suns' java leagal issues

--- On Mon, 11/17/08, Conrad Meyer wrote: > Just a guess -- I'd guess there's a either a > "no redistribution" > or "non-commercial only" redistribution clause, > either of which is a no go. "non-commercial only" is a restriction on the "freedom" of the software. I don't think this causes a problem with putting it into the "non-free" repo. We already have "non-commercial only" software in the "non-free" repo. Well, we have to read Sun's user agreement to see if it is OK to redistribute it. If it allows redistribution I vote for distributing the RPM in rpmfusion. Btw, I recently checked adobe's flash agreement. That one definitely forbids redistribution. -oget