Re: rpmfusion:kernel modules decision: kmod
On 30.09.2008 07:17, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 15:24 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 22:18 +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
>> On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 20:42 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>> Not that it matters much, but I'd prefer if we could keep madwifi for a
>>> little while longer if possible without to much hassle.
>>>
>>> But yeah, if ath5k really does all the major things the users need then
>>> it might be time to drop madwifi.
>> FWIW, does ath5k support the EeePC 701's wifi chip? A version of
>> madwifi that does is in livna-testing.
> iirc, that's the same chip that is in the Acer Aspire One (an AR2425),
> and yes, rawhide ath5k does support it just fine.
Excellent. Then I'm all for dropping madwifi (for whatever miniscule
amount it's worth).
Well, before dropping I'd really like to not only know if all the
hardware is supported (there might be other hardware that is not yet
supported by ath5k and ath9k as of 2.6.27 -- nobody from us checked that
yet afaics), but also if ath5k and ath9k can do more than just the
basics. I for example was told that monitor mode doesn't work yet with
ath9k; more than just a handful of people might want to use that. Same
with support for master mode (but the number of people doing that is
likely a lot smaller).
CU
knurd