Xavier Lamien wrote:
> 2008/5/4 Ian Chapman <packages(a)amiga-hardware.com>:
>
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Just a quick note to those who it concerns that Dribble is now frozen
and
> > no new updates or packages will be permitted there. Most contributors
are
> > migrating their packages to RPM Fusion, including most of mine. Thanks
very
> > much and I wish RPM Fusion the best of luck.
> >
> >
>
> Thanks a lot Ian,
>
> I think dribble will be the first to merge in next couple of days, as we
> have a clean frozen version of packages set.
>
> Hans give a signal for cvssync.
>
>
Xavier,
We (Dribble) don't have a CVS, given the low package count and churn we've
always been passing Ian srpms to build.
So in order to get dribble's packages into rpmfusion cvs / look a side,
someone would need to go to:
http://dribble.org.uk/listrpms4.html
Create cvs modules for all srpms listed there and then use cvs-import on
the srpms linked from there to populate the cvs modules.
Owners for the modules can be found here:
http://rpmfusion.org/InitialPackageMerge
But I guess all owners first need to have a FAS account, so maybe now would
be a good moment to send a mail to the list asking everyone to create a FAS
account?
Hmm, I just realized that creating cvs modules isn't that easy because we
first need to decide on a package for package base wether it goes to
non-free or free.
So what are the rules for free? I would like to suggest the following:
"free: anything of which all components are under a license which is listed
as
good on:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing
Notice that free fully follows this webpage except that chapter 6
"Software
Types" is ignored.
Notice that anything depending upon anything in non-free must be in
non-free
itself."
Can everyone live with this? If we can agree this is the rule for the
non-free free split, then I can make a list of which packages in dribble
should go where.
Hi !
I agree from this. I just want to notice that "-nonfree" expects at
least the package to be redistributable.
I don't expect dribble have such packages. But amr{nb,wb} codecs are
( altought opensource - we even cannot retristribute the sources).
For such cases i guess it would be desirable to have nosrc.rpm in the
SRPMS non-free section.
I will request a review if allowed.
Also all packages that can go to Fedora shouldn't be allowed in RPM Fusion.
( I have submitted some perl package freshrpms use for dvdrip at least)
I don't know if this can concern some p2p programs that are
problematic in some country...
Nicolas (kwizart)