On 08/24/2016 11:35 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2016-08-24 18:55 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski
<orion(a)cora.nwra.com>:
> On 08/23/2016 12:15 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>> 2016-08-23 20:06 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski <orion(a)cora.nwra.com>:
>>> Does anyone here have any ffmpeg knowledge that would give a reason for
>>> preferring anything other than the current ffmpeg 3.1.1 for EL7? Does
ffmpeg
>>> have a long-term-support branch?
>> There is issue with stable vlc-2.2x which I plan to have in el7, also
>> the current kodi 0.16 version doesn't cope well with ffmpeg 3.1x
>> I think it's easier to have ffmpeg 3.0x in el7, but then I don't know
>> other dependencies that might have issue.
>
> Given the pain of later updates, it might be worth waiting a bit for vlc 3.0
> and kodi 0.17 to land (or get sufficiently stable).
I don't expect vlc-3 in EL7 as a first step. VLC 2.2x is there and
more relevant for long term support, and specially since EL8 shoudn't
be that far away for vlc-3x.
Okay, although based on past timescales I wouldn't expect EL8 until Q4 2017.
Based on that ffmpeg-2.8x seems a more relevant ABI to start with
EL7.
And later we can still update the whole multimedia stack with
ffmpeg-3.1+ vlc3+ koji17 then introduce a fmpeg-2.8x as ffmpeg-compat
to keep "stable ABI"
This has always been a problem to build latest ffmpeg in stable
release without to break ABI. we should probably have a "SCL build of
ffmpeg" for those that will only rely on the ffmpeg binaries or fast
moving projects using the ffmpeg libraries.
One suggestion that's been getting more traction on the EPEL side of things is
to just start with versioned packages that can co-exist. So start with
ffmpeg2.8 and ffmpeg3.0 from the start.
SCLs are a major pain.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301
http://www.nwra.com