Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

On 12/27/2015 09:04 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 01:48:23AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On 12/27/2015 01:11 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > > Also, RPMFusion respects Fedora packaging guidelines or not? > > > > > > yes we do > > > > Aparently RPMFusion does not repect the FPG. Packages complying > > to the FPG are supposed to have been rebuilt for f23 and > > therefore to carry a package suffix of ".f23". > > Not really. There are often mass rebuild during Fedora > development, caused by various reasons: new GCC, change of default > compiler flags, hardening etc.  But mass rebuild is not required > for every Fedora release. > At last someone comprehends what I meant. Beyond .fc suffix (that could create confusion during Fedora upgrade however), here you're saying that RPMFusion packages must not be audited periodically, even for months, it's enough they work. I ask again, how can we know if a package .fc(x) compiles/works fine on Fedora(x+n) without a rebuild?