[Bug 3335] Review Request: libde265 - Open H.265 video codec implementation

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3335 --- Comment #12 from Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com&gt; 2015-11-09 21:07:32 CET --- I can take the review once the SRPM is updated to the latest version. Some feedback on the spec file: 1. The project URL tag should probably be: http://www.libde265.org/ 2. Is renaming the executables necessary? Do they conflict with another package? 3. While the binaries are examples, if they're useful enough, why put them in a -examples subpackage? Along the same lines, should libde265 provide packages similar in structure to x264/x265? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.