Re: Broken deps - RPM Fusion free Fedora development - 2008-12-15

On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:57:47 +0100, Julian wrote: > Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski pisze: >> On Monday, 15 December 2008 at 21:21, Julian Sikorski wrote: >>> Michael Schwendt pisze: >> [...] >>>> ====================================================================== >>>> Broken packages in rpmfusion-free-development-x86_64: >>>> >>>> ffmpeg-libs-0.4.9-0.52.20080908.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 >>>> gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.9-1.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 >>>> libquicktime-1.0.3-4.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 >>>> mencoder-1.0-0.103.20080903svn.fc10.i386 requires libfaac.so.0 >> [...] >>> I am somewhat responsible for faac, I suggested to update it but did not >>> notice the abi bump. Sorry. Please let me know if I can help to bring >>> this back to shape. >> Well, you could check if there haven't been any API changes, IOW if the >> affected packages build against the new faac. I would prefer it if this >> build were removed because we're in the middle of rebuilding most of our >> multimedia stack against the new x264 and ffmpeg and I don't want any >> unnecessary release bumps and rebuilds. >> >> Regards, >> R. >> > Hmm, I just installed the faac-1.26 on my Fedora 10, and it seems the > soname is the same: > $ rpm -q --provides faac > libfaac.so.0()(64bit) > faac = 1.26-1.fc11 > faac(x86-64) = 1.26-1.fc11 > $ readelf -a /usr/lib64/libfaac.so.0.0.0 |grep SONAME > 0x000000000000000e (SONAME) Library soname: [libfaac.so.0] And what are you trying to prove? * Notice the repository id. * Notice the package %arch. * Draw your conclusion. * Confirm by listing the repo directory.