https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3551
--- Comment #7 from MartinKG <mgansser(a)alice.de> 2015-02-24 18:48:44 CET ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Ok, it looks like you're removing two of the bundled libraries
but two still
remain.
In the case of natupnp.h it looks like it's only used on win32 so no problems
there, I would rm -rf thirdparty/natupnp to make sure.
done
In the case of sort.h we don't seem to be as lucky. Header only libraries are
treated as static libraries for packaging purposes.
It may be easy enough to request a bundling exception to the RPM Fusion devel
list as we don't have a formal process like Fedora proper. I don't see this as
being a big risk.
If granted, then we would need to add a virtual provides for tracking purposes:
Provides: bundled(timsort)
new rpm files:
Spec URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/openclonk.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/openclonk-5.5.1-6.fc21.src...
%changelog
* Tue Feb 24 2015 Martin Gansser <martinkg(a)fedoraproject.org> - 5.5.1-6
- dropped CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS flags because already sets by %%cmake macro
- dropped CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX because already sets by %%cmake macro
- removed bundled natupnp
- added virtual provides for tracking purposes
what is the next step ?
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.