https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3430
Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Blocks|2 |4
--- Comment #2 from Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com> 2015-12-28 16:33:38 CET
---
Full review done:
Good:
=====
- rpmlint checks return:
qtads.src: W: invalid-license non-commercial
qtads.src: W: invalid-license non-commercial
qtads.src:25: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(md5-deutsch-c++)
qtads.src:26: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(sha2-gladman)
qtads.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial
qtads.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial
qtads-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings.
These can all be ignored
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (non-commercial) OK, text in %license, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- .desktop file provided and properly installed
Everything in order: Approved.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.