Re: owners.list not entirely right

Thorsten Leemhuis pisze: > On 14.10.2008 11:57, Xavier Lamien wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Julian Sikorski <belegdol(a)gmail.com&gt; >> wrote: >>> I skimmed through owners.list for my packages and it seems the setup is >>> not entirely right. Since the packages I maintain in nonfree are also >>> comaintained by Chris Stone, I believe for qmc2 and sdlmame* he should >>> be added to initialcc, and in the case where Chris is the primary >>> maintainer (sdlmess), I should be. >>> Could you please also have a look at the cvs acls (if these aren't the >>> same). A while ago Thorsten rebuilt sdlmame due to some buildsys issues, >>> and I did not get any mail regarding cvs commit. >> Co-maintainers are registered in cvs acls from CVS admin requested >> (cvs will do its job to mail maintainer and co-maintainer). >> initalcc is something else where anybody could request to be added to >> track changes in cvs. > /me wonders if that's supposed to be read as "Julian, please file a > proper cvs change request in bugzilla" > >> I'll have a look on sdlmame > No need to afaics -- I just queued the build with the old tag (and hence > did not commit anything to cvs), as the older build had never left the > buildsys. I don't mean requeueing

If that's reasonable, I could file cvs admin requests for all appropriate packages, so that the acls could be checked.