2016-10-18 16:45 GMT+02:00 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com>:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Nicolas Chauvet
<kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2016-10-18 15:36 GMT+02:00 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)rpmfusion.org>:
> > commit bb01bb1e4d390e5d61a697fba30f12c556c42a9e
> > Author: Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com>
> > Date: Tue Oct 18 08:36:45 2016 -0500
> >
> > Remove files from scm as now an archive is provided.
> @Richard,
>
> Sorry, but I don't understand why you have forked akmods in your
> namespace that way.
> This is going to be more difficult to review the changes made.
Sergio and I thought it was a good idea as SCM != Upstream and to give it a
proper home. I don't see how it really makes anything more difficult, the
changes are in github.
Yep, but this was totally unannounced changes, so you have
failed an
important step at making free software, the advertising part.
I was not able to review the changes made even if I'm co-admin of the
package. So this is making the workflow harder.
Furthermore, if there is really a need to have a separate repos, which
I still fails to see any argument for, this has to be made in the
rpmfusion-infra namespace, like others projects do.
(until we have a better location such as a public
git.rpmfusion.org
running pagure or else).
If you would rather support it, that's fine with me, I only took
it because
it was unmaintained and I needed it for the nvidia drivers.
Yeah, that's always
like that, don't worry I took the infra to
maintain for the very same reason.
Above all, I'd like theses kind of changes to be peer reviewed. This
is how a community repo can hold, if not this is only an aggregate of
first to come ideas.
Thx
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)