[Bug 247] Review Request: mac - Monkey's Audio Codec (MAC) utility and library

(In reply to comment #6) > Thanks kwizart, but could you address these issues that I pointed as well? > > Without this one, I don't think it is appropriate to distribute mac in the > first place: > > * I'm attaching the email I received from the author. We should probably put it If we think the redistribution is a problem, then We will have to wait for the license to be added to the source package itsef. As having the text that allow the redistribution not taken from the source package is completely irrelevant (specially as the mail comes from an untrusted source not even gpg signed). Here are some example of package that was waiting for such addition, even if the license was attached to the bugzilla. This was the case in the Ralink firmware reviews here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230164 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230161

If you have found any package that doesn't have the text to allow for redistribution added to the source package itself, please warn FE-LEGAL as this package shouldn't have been added to the repository. > > in %doc's of all packages. > > > > Please remove this "fake" license: > > * Do we need to ship the COPYING file? Please check its content. Why Not ? What is explained here is that License was not LGPL despite written as such in the day it was provided from sourceforge. It explains something very important, there was never a LGPL version of this mac source code.