Re: qtractor moved to Fedora

On 05/21/2012 09:50 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > Le 20 mai 2012 23:24, "Kevin Kofler" <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at > <mailto:kevin.kofler@chello.at>> a écrit : > > >    Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >     > But in this case I wonder why not to simply override the no >     > replacement policy ? At least a good reason would need to be > provided >     > for still obeying this policy. > >    Users in countries which obey software patents might not want their >    patent- >    compliant package silently replaced by a patent-encumbered one. > > It doens't hold, RPM Fusion free is fully made of patent encumbered > components by design. > Which make me wonder if we really need to requires the > rpmfusion-free-release from the rpmfusion-nonfree-release from patent > point of view. > > My point is that people using mp3 enabled qtractor from current RPM > Fusion shouldn't received a disabled package either. > > Nicolas (kwizart) I completely understand your concern here. Orcan has indicated that he was looking to find a new maintainer for qtractor in any case. I'm more than happy to maintain both and personally deal with the fallout. I think in Fedora renaming this anything other than the 'qtractor' is unlikely. I'm happy to consider the alternatives option