On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Stewart Adam wrote:
>
> That sounds fine - I think maybe a DVD spin with all the rpmfusion
> packages would be useful as well for offline installs.
>
My experience (with xfce, games and other locale specific spins) is limited
to the Live media spins. I haven't looked into Pungi much. If anyone else
wants to help by maintaining a dvd spin, I would appreciate that.
>
> This is thinking way ahead, but while we're on the topic of spins do you
> think it's fair to say we should respin once every 2-3 months? That
> means we could have (roughly) the gold release + 2 respins along the way
> per release of Fedora. Until DRPM support gets into the build infra, I
> think this would be a good thing to do since another really annoying
> thing for users is having to wait 4 hours for a large DVD iso to
> download, then after installing they find they need some 150 updates!
Yeah, we should be able to generate images very easily. Testing can be a
problem since updates have before introduced regressions that affect the way
the installation works (or does not for that matter). I hope others can help
with that.
>
> Just to be on the safe(r?) legal side, maybe we should preinstall
> packages from only rpmfusion-free but have the rpmfusion-nonfree repo
> enabled.
>
This is what I am going with as of now.
>
> freefusion sounds good, but I think the name might be a bit misleading
> if we enable or preinstall nonfree packages, or users might ask about a
> "nonfreefusion" spin.
I looked a while back and realized
freefusion.org is unavailable as well.
Who wants to name the baby?
Total Fusion. But that sounds a bit unprofessional. Fused Hat?
Though an RPMfusion companion CD with a user-friendly installer is
probably a more appropriate short-term goal
.
--
Michel Salim
http://hircus.jaiku.com/