Hi,
On Dom, 2015-11-29 at 12:11 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2015-11-29 6:03 GMT+01:00 Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com>:
> Hi,
>
> On Sáb, 2015-11-28 at 23:02 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> >
> >
> > 2015-11-28 21:32 GMT+01:00 Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com>:
> > > Need updates :
> >
> > > F21:
> > > sonic-visualiser-2.4.1-2.fc21.src.rpm
> > > sonic-visualiser-freeworld-2.1-2.fc21.src.rpm
> > > F22:
> > > sonic-visualiser-2.4.1-2.fc22.src.rpm
> > > sonic-visualiser-freeworld-2.1-2.fc22.src.rpm
> > > F23:
> > > sonic-visualiser-2.4.1-4.fc23.src.rpm
> > > sonic-visualiser-freeworld-2.1-2.fc22.src.rpm
> > Sorry, I don't understand all this.
> > What question are you trying to answear ?
> >
> > Because the question is not:" is the package rebuild for f23" ?
> but
> > instead:
> > Is the package at the correct version in f23 (in a first step).
> > If already at the correct version, can we keep the same build as
> f22
> > or rebuilt it for f23 (the reason for the rebuild is because it's
> c++
> > and/or there is a soname bump for it's dependencies).
> >
> > if you want me do to something, I need a "list " for free section
> and
> > the list for the nonfree section.
>
> This is a comprehensive list of all freeworld packages that are in
> Rpmfusion and the counter-part in Fedora. I also sent the corrects
> cases to show that I reviewed *all* freeworld packages.
>
> I checked F23 and also F21 and F22 , because in some cases I don't
> know
> if it need updates, for example k3b .
>
>
> Mini manual (for maintainers) to update his packages :
>
> For updates F22 and F23 the workflow is as follow:
> - The maintainer which want update his package, clone his package
> from
> github [1], modify in his account what wants and when finish block
> tracker bug #3820, to sync with git preview.
> - Provenpackager will update to git preview and move to the tracker
> bug
> #3821 to build and publish .
>
> Please open a bug report, don't need to write more than name of the
> package and location of modifications, is just to use the "blocks"
> of
> bugzilla.
> Of course this is temporary, until infra support acls ...
>
> I will send a new list of the freeworld packages soon .
>
> [
1] https://github.com/rpmfusion/yourpackage
>
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Sérgio M. B.
>
Sorry this is not the way to go. we use bugzilla for this kind of
request to maintainers.
First I'm exposing the data collected, second explains how we can
update it, 3rd analyze what remains wrong, 4th open bug reports against
components that are wrong and add "the" mini manual (for maintainers) ,
5th if someone want to fix it but is not the package maintainer,
reports in same bug the patch or solutions, 6th if maintainer lacks of
response or the patch is trivial, provenpackage can commit it and add
the number of the bug report on the changelog of spec .
I sending new list of "all" freeworld packages , also we have to
analyze multilibs in some packages , so it is (again) the comprehensive
list but improved and corrected .
About split nonfree , we only have sox-plugins-nonfree and xmms2-
nonfree but both also they have a free part.
For complete the report, we have:
- libtunepimp-extras-freeworld-0.5.3-13.fc22.src.rpm, libtunepimp is
retired in rawhide (f24) [1]
- qtractor-freeworld-0.5.7-1.fc19.src.rpm have already been kicked out
:) but is active in Fedora [2].
So please read the mini manual, clone
github.com/rpmfusion and send
updates via bugzilla.
Thanks,
If the package isn't updated in time, I will need to kick it out
from
the f23 ga repository.
[
1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/libtunepimp/
[
2] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=13802
--
Sérgio M. B.