https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2801
Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #6 from Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com> 2013-05-17 21:21:52 CEST
---
Hi,
May I point out that mixxx is already in rpmfusion, it needs some loving,
specifically it is FTBFS in F-19+, but it is already there.
I suggest you file a bug against mixx with (a) patch(es) to the package with
any improvements you may have (such as making it build on F-19+). Please base
your work on top of the existing package.
I see you blocked NEEDSPONSORS, is that because you're new to rpmfusion, or new
to Fedora packaging in general? If you're already a sponsored/approved Fedora
packager, you don't need separate sponsor ship in rpmfusion, and you could ask
for co-maintainer-ship of mixxx in the same bug.
Regards,
Hans
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.