On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com&gt; wrote: > Hi, this package was retired on RPMFusion F24 , but I don't know if > it > was a good idea.  Because : > > 1 - it builds without problem  > 2 - devede stops to work , doesn't start until we install > vcdimager, > even comment check vcdimager command still offer to make VCD, sVCD > or > CVD  > 3 - Also xine will lose ability to read vcds ) I have to check this > item better. > > In resume seems that give us less work unretire it and maintain it > than > retire it, I my mind we just need retire it when begin to be one > FTBFS > ...  > > what is your vote ?  > > A- keep it retired  > B- Unretire it  I'm all for unretiring it but who will be the maintainer? I can't really take on any more packages right now. I can barely keep up with what I have.

Thanks, Richard 

Hi, this package was retired on RPMFusion F24 , but I don't know if it was a good idea. Because : 1 - it builds without problem 2 - devede stops to work , doesn't start until we install vcdimager, even comment check vcdimager command still offer to make VCD, sVCD or CVD

On Dom, 2016-07-10 at 16:36 +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > If you are interested, I have a review request for devedeng: > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4013 > > devede is no longer maintained upstream. yes , I found it 2 or 3 days ago , now that seems we will have RPMfusion rawhide ! , we can put devedeng there . But shouldn't devedeng replace devede ? , i.e., or rename package or even just update devede package with new code (devedeng), or do you want the 2 packages, devede and devedeng, at same time ?