x86_64 packages in i686 builds
- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2024 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 10:33 +0100,
rpmfusion-buildsys(a)lists.rpmfusion.org wrote:
Job failed on arch i686
...
Build logs may be found at
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-12-rpmfusion_free/6367-VirtualB...
...
DEBUG util.py:256: Transaction Check Error:
DEBUG util.py:256:
file /usr/share/VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-3.1.4/VirtualBox-OSE-kmod-3.1.4.tar.xz conflicts
between attempted installs of VirtualBox-OSE-kmodsrc-3.1.4-1.fc12.x86_64 and
VirtualBox-OSE-kmodsrc-3.1.4-1.fc12.i686
Apart from the fact that I could probably fix the package not to have
multilib conflict with this file, I'm wondering how did the x86_64
package sneak in the i686 build? Is that intended?
--
Flash is the Web2.0 version of blink and animated gifs.
-- Stephen Smoogen
This is happening again, the kdenlive i686 build is pulling in an x86_64
package from needsign:
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-12-rpmfusion_free/6444-
kdenlive-0.7.7-1.fc12/i686/job.log
mlt-0.5.0-2.fc12.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free-needsign has depsolving problems
--> Missing Dependency: libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) is needed by
package mlt-0.5.0-2.fc12.x86_64 (rpmfusion-free-needsign)
(and many more, which is kinda expected as it's a 64-bit package in a 32-bit
build).
The offending builder according to the same log is builder.wilsonet.com.
Kevin Kofler
5412
days inactive
5419
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
1 comments
2 participants
tags (0)
participants (2)
-
Kevin Kofler -
Lubomir Rintel