5:40 p.m.
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
Bug #: 2855
Summary: Flowblade
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: klaatu(a)straightedgelinux.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Flowblade Movie Editor is a multitrack non-linear video editor for Linux
released under GPL 3 license.
Flowblade is designed to provide a fast, precise and as-simple-as-possible
editing experience.
Flowblade employs film style editing paradigm in which clips are usually
automatically placed tightly after the previous clip - or between two existing
clips - when they are inserted on the timeline. Edits are fine tuned by
trimming in and out points of clips, or by cutting and deleting parts of clips.
Film style editing is faster for creating programs with mostly straight cuts
and audio splits, but may be slower when programs contain complex composites
unless correct work flow is followed.
spec file:
----------
http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade.spec
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5:47 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Flowblade
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
Klaatu <klaatu(a)straightedgelinux.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |http://code.google.com/p/fl
| |owblade
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
6:09 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Flowblade
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hobbes1069(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> 2013-07-02 20:09:15 CEST ---
Request is missing a few things, see:
http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Create_a_package_review_request
Are you already a Fedora Packager?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
6:35 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
Klaatu <klaatu(a)straightedgelinux.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Flowblade |Review request: flowblade -
| |A fast, efficient video
| |editor
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
Klaatu <klaatu(a)straightedgelinux.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |2, 30
--- Comment #2 from Klaatu <klaatu(a)straightedgelinux.com> 2013-07-02 21:00:59 CEST
---
Full URLs to the spec file and source rpm of the package.
spec:
http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade.spec
source rpm:
http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade-0.8.0-1.src.rpm
%description
Flowblade is a fast and efficient video editor written in Python
and based on the MLT and ffmpeg engines.
Ineligible for Fedora due to ffmpeg dependency
This is my first RPM Fusion Package.
I am seeking a sponsor, as I am not a Fedora Packager.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7:48 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sergio(a)serjux.com
--- Comment #3 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> 2013-07-02 21:48:09 CEST ---
please remove all this :
%define _topdir /tmp/rpmbuild
%define buildroot %{_topdir}/%{name}-%{version}-root
BuildRoot: %{_topdir}/%{name}-buildroot
Prefix: /usr
%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
are redundant or worst
#% this will not comment, just you need remove %
where is ?
URL:
and
Source0:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
2:50 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
--- Comment #4 from Klaatu <klaatu(a)straightedgelinux.com> 2013-07-03 04:50:56 CEST
---
Updated spec file to roll in Sergio's suggestions.
URL to corrected spec file is the same as before:
http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade.spec
URL for src RPM:
http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade-0.8.0-1.fc18.src.rpm
rpmlint issues no errors, these warnings:
flowblade.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ffmpeg -> imperf
## ignoring since 'ffmpeg' in description is properly spelled
flowblade.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
https://flowblade.googlecode.com/files/flowblade-0.8.0.tar.gz HTTP Error 404:
Not Found
## ignoring because a manual wget of that url works as expected.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
12:20 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
--- Comment #5 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> 2013-07-03 14:20:19 CEST ---
Hi, looks good thanks,
you may also clean :
rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
I can do a little review but I'm too busy to have this task .
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
12:57 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
--- Comment #6 from Klaatu <klaatu(a)straightedgelinux.com> 2013-07-03 14:57:07 CEST
---
(In reply to comment #5)
Hi, looks good thanks,
you may also clean :
rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
I can do a little review but I'm too busy to have this task .
Sergio, in your previous comment (comment #3) I think you told me to take the
rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT out, Did I misunderstand? For now I'm adding it back in
because it feels right to be tidy.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1:08 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
--- Comment #7 from Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> 2013-07-03 15:08:13 CEST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
> Hi, looks good thanks,
>
> you may also clean :
> rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
>
> I can do a little review but I'm too busy to have this task .
Sergio, in your previous comment (comment #3) I think you told me to take the
rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT out, Did I misunderstand? For now I'm adding it back in
because it feels right to be tidy.
You can remove it as it's done automatically. It hasn't been needed since
Fedora 14. There's some corner cases when you have multiple sources, but that's
not the case here.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1:11 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
--- Comment #8 from Klaatu <klaatu(a)straightedgelinux.com> 2013-07-03 15:11:30 CEST
---
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > Hi, looks good thanks,
> >
> > you may also clean :
> > rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
> >
> > I can do a little review but I'm too busy to have this task .
>
> Sergio, in your previous comment (comment #3) I think you told me to take the
> rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT out, Did I misunderstand? For now I'm adding it back in
> because it feels right to be tidy.
You can remove it as it's done automatically. It hasn't been needed since
Fedora 14. There's some corner cases when you have multiple sources, but that's
not the case here.
Re-removed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1:54 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
--- Comment #9 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> 2013-07-03 15:54:54 CEST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > (In reply to comment #5)
> > > Hi, looks good thanks,
> > >
> > > you may also clean :
> > > rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
> > >
> > > I can do a little review but I'm too busy to have this task .
> >
> > Sergio, in your previous comment (comment #3) I think you told me to take the
> > rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT out, Did I misunderstand? For now I'm adding it back
in
> > because it feels right to be tidy.
>
> You can remove it as it's done automatically. It hasn't been needed since
> Fedora 14. There's some corner cases when you have multiple sources, but
that's
> not the case here.
Re-removed.
thanks, I though that you had miss that at first time ...
but the reason that I ask you to do so, is when we use mock with --no-clean or
--no-clean-after etc , for debug proposes, sometimes this cleans may change the
mock behavior and may make us lose more time.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
2 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
--- Comment #10 from Klaatu <klaatu(a)straightedgelinux.com> 2013-07-03 16:00:55 CEST
---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > (In reply to comment #6)
> > > (In reply to comment #5)
> > > > Hi, looks good thanks,
> > > >
> > > > you may also clean :
> > > > rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
> > > >
> > > > I can do a little review but I'm too busy to have this task .
> > >
> > > Sergio, in your previous comment (comment #3) I think you told me to take
the
> > > rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT out, Did I misunderstand? For now I'm adding it
back in
> > > because it feels right to be tidy.
> >
> > You can remove it as it's done automatically. It hasn't been needed
since
> > Fedora 14. There's some corner cases when you have multiple sources, but
that's
> > not the case here.
>
> Re-removed.
thanks, I though that you had miss that at first time ...
but the reason that I ask you to do so, is when we use mock with --no-clean or
--no-clean-after etc , for debug proposes, sometimes this cleans may change the
mock behavior and may make us lose more time.
Understood, thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7:40 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
--- Comment #11 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> 2013-07-03 21:40:16 CEST ---
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade-0.8.0-1.src.rpm
let see if "fedora-review -u
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855"
works !
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7:44 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
--- Comment #12 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> 2013-07-03 21:44:09 CEST ---
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade-0.8.0-1.fc18.src.rpm
fixed srpm URL
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7:49 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
--- Comment #13 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> 2013-07-03 21:49:31 CEST ---
fedora-review -uhttps://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
or
fedora-review --other-bz https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org -b 2855
(...)
error: %changelog not in descending chronological order
and breaks fedora-review :)
ERROR: Exception down the road...(logs in
/home/sergio/.cache/fedora-review.log)
which is a bug in fedora-review , but we can't processed without fix changelog
dates .
Thanks
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
2:31 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
--- Comment #14 from Klaatu <klaatu(a)straightedgelinux.com> 2013-07-04 04:31:19 CEST
---
(In reply to comment #13)
fedora-review -uhttps://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
or
fedora-review --other-bz https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org -b 2855
(...)
error: %changelog not in descending chronological order
and breaks fedora-review :)
ERROR: Exception down the road...(logs in
/home/sergio/.cache/fedora-review.log)
which is a bug in fedora-review , but we can't processed without fix changelog
dates .
Thanks
Fixed changelog order.
Tried to run fedora-review but it failed; complains about me not running
rawhide (true) and claims there is no /usr/bin/python (false) so I'm assuming I
have mock or something configured incorrectly. This is the first I'd heard of
fedora-review, so I am probably using it wrong.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
4:49 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
Alec Leamas <leamas.alec(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |leamas.alec(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #15 from Alec Leamas <leamas.alec(a)gmail.com> 2013-07-04 06:49:53 CEST
---
Just some drive-by comments:
I'd guess that you are indeed missing /usr/bin/python in the mock chroot,
you're missing the mandatory python BuiltRequires, see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires
BTW: fedora-review does nothing wrong here (or when crashing on bad changelog
order). Basically, fedora-review expects the package to build in mock and
cannot really do much about if it doesn't.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1:17 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
--- Comment #16 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> 2013-07-04 15:17:06 CEST ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Fixed changelog order.
Tried to run fedora-review but it failed; complains about me not running
rawhide (true) and claims there is no /usr/bin/python (false) so I'm assuming I
have mock or something configured incorrectly. This is the first I'd heard of
fedora-review, so I am probably using it wrong.
try see if this doc helps:
http://www.serjux.com/alps/how_to_use_mock.txt
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review --other-bz https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org
-b 2855
pre-review:
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[!]: Buildroot is not present
Note: Invalid buildroot found: %{_topdir}/%{name}-buildroot
[!]: Dist tag is present.
[!]: update-mime-database is invoked as required
Note: mimeinfo files in: flowblade
[!]: Spec use %global instead of %define.
Note: %define name flowblade %define release 1%{?dist} %define version
0.8.0
seems be related with:
[!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see attached
diff).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
3:36 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
--- Comment #17 from Klaatu <klaatu(a)straightedgelinux.com> 2013-07-05 17:36:50 CEST
---
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade-0.8.0-1.src.rpm
removed %dist, s/%define/%global/g, installed python2-devel...trying
fedora-review again..
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
3:55 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
--- Comment #18 from Klaatu <klaatu(a)straightedgelinux.com> 2013-07-05 17:55:40 CEST
---
Still getting an error in mock logs regarding /usr/bin/python: no such file or
directory
I've installed python2-devel and have added myself to mock group.
the relevant error seems to be this:
+ python setup.py build
--build-base=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/flowblade-0.8.0-1.i386
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.jk9gxU: line 35: python: command not found
I've tried using both the macro %{python} and just plain 'python' in the spec
file.
What am I missing? how can I ensure that /usr/bin/python gets included into my
chroot environment?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
4:28 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
Paul Howarth <paul(a)city-fan.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |paul(a)city-fan.org
--- Comment #19 from Paul Howarth <paul(a)city-fan.org> 2013-07-05 18:28:47 CEST ---
(In reply to comment #18)
Still getting an error in mock logs regarding /usr/bin/python: no
such file or
directory
I've installed python2-devel and have added myself to mock group.
the relevant error seems to be this:
+ python setup.py build
--build-base=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/flowblade-0.8.0-1.i386
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.jk9gxU: line 35: python: command not found
I've tried using both the macro %{python} and just plain 'python' in the
spec
file.
What am I missing? how can I ensure that /usr/bin/python gets included into my
chroot environment?
You add to your spec:
BuildRequires: python2-devel
as indicated in Comment #15.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8:48 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
--- Comment #20 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> 2013-07-05 22:48:41 CEST ---
(In reply to comment #19)
(In reply to comment #18)
> Still getting an error in mock logs regarding /usr/bin/python: no such file or
> directory
>
> I've installed python2-devel and have added myself to mock group.
>
> the relevant error seems to be this:
>
> + python setup.py build
> --build-base=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/flowblade-0.8.0-1.i386
> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.jk9gxU: line 35: python: command not found
>
> I've tried using both the macro %{python} and just plain 'python' in the
spec
> file.
>
> What am I missing? how can I ensure that /usr/bin/python gets included into my
> chroot environment?
You add to your spec:
BuildRequires: python2-devel
as indicated in Comment #15.
one guess , you know that you need a lots of internet, every mock build
downloads all packages from internet .
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
9 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
--- Comment #21 from Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> 2013-07-05 23:00:32 CEST ---
I think he got a little confused. When you use mock, what you have installed on
your system (other than the mock requirements) are irrelevant. Mock builds your
package in a clean chroot[1] and only installs some defaults and whatever you
specify in "BuildRequires:" so the fact you have python2-devel installed on
your system doesn't matter, it must be in the BuildRequires:.
[1] http://lwn.net/Articles/252794/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
11:45 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
--- Comment #22 from Klaatu <klaatu(a)straightedgelinux.com> 2013-07-06 01:45:14 CEST
---
(In reply to comment #21)
I think he got a little confused. When you use mock, what you have
installed on
your system (other than the mock requirements) are irrelevant. Mock builds your
package in a clean chroot[1] and only installs some defaults and whatever you
specify in "BuildRequires:" so the fact you have python2-devel installed on
your system doesn't matter, it must be in the BuildRequires:.
[1] http://lwn.net/Articles/252794/
BuildRequires. that explains it. thanks.
Fixed everything. Now clearing failures from fedora-review review.txt..
Apparenltly %dist is required; adding it back in, updating urls one more time:
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade-0.8.0-1.fc18.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
12:37 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
--- Comment #23 from Klaatu <klaatu(a)straightedgelinux.com> 2013-07-06 02:37:40 CEST
---
fedora-review failures:
SHOULD:
[!]: Dist tag is present.
##I have %dist included in the same way rpmdev-newspec does. Am I supposed to
include it elsewhere as well?
[!]: update-mime-database is invoked as required
Note: mimeinfo files in: flowblade
## I have it running in %post. Is this incorrect? or perhaps it's related to
the following and final error:
EXTRA:
[!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: Mock build failed
## there are no errors in build.log or results/build.log. Where do I look for
an explanation of this one?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
12:45 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
--- Comment #24 from Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> 2013-07-06 02:45:02 CEST ---
No, I think it's just confused because of the way you have your spec laid
out...
%global name flowblade
%global release 1%{?dist}
%global version 0.8.0
Get rid of this, just use the tags directly, i.e.:
Name: flowblade
Version: 0.8.0
Release: 1%{?dist}
Also:
%install
rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
kill the rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
2:38 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
--- Comment #25 from Klaatu <klaatu(a)straightedgelinux.com> 2013-07-07 04:38:14 CEST
---
(In reply to comment #24)
No, I think it's just confused because of the way you have your
spec laid
out...
%global name flowblade
%global release 1%{?dist}
%global version 0.8.0
Get rid of this, just use the tags directly, i.e.:
Name: flowblade
Version: 0.8.0
Release: 1%{?dist}
Also:
%install
rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
kill the rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT...
Got rid of the %global declarations, got rid of the rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
fedora-review still fails in two places; update mime is not run, and rpmlint is
not run on all packages. I think the install itself is failing; I see errors
about it requiring mlt, ffmpeg, and some others, and I tried changing those to
BuidRequires in spite of being pretty sure they aren't required to build a
python application, and it made no difference.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1:54 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
--- Comment #26 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> 2013-07-07 15:54:53 CEST ---
(In reply to comment #25)
I think the install itself is failing; I see errors
about it requiring mlt, ffmpeg, and some others,
yeah I though about this, it will fail because fedora-review may use "fedora
buildroot" and not use "rpmfusion buildroot" which of course will fail. I
have
to investigate this further , and find a solution for fedora-review works 100%
with rpmfusion .
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
4:43 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
--- Comment #27 from Alec Leamas <leamas.alec(a)gmail.com> 2013-07-07 18:43:26 CEST
---
Yup, that's why. Try e. g., fedora-review --other-bz
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/ -b 2855 -m
fedora-rawhide-i386-rpmfusion_nonfree or use the example on
https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/wiki/UsageScenarios
fedora-review's devel version has this message, I don't think the released
version handles it:
- update-desktop-database is invoked as required
Note: desktop file(s) with MimeType entry in flowblade
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#desktop-
database
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
6:07 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
--- Comment #28 from Klaatu <klaatu(a)straightedgelinux.com> 2013-07-08 20:07:49 CEST
---
Thanks for the help.
I tried the dev version of fedora-review, fixed the %post and %postun command
as recommended in the output of (try-)fedora-review and I get no further
errors.
rpmlint still throws an error about a non-executable file; this seems to be
more of a setup.py issue than mine, but I added a find/chmod to fix it.
Strictly speaking, I'm not even sure it's necessary, since I've never seen an
issue with it when using Flowblade.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
6:24 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
--- Comment #29 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> 2013-07-08 20:24:42 CEST ---
Created attachment 1126
--> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=1126
package versioning
Hi,
I suggest that you version yours change , like my patch does ,is much more
readable.
other suggestion is build src.rpm with rpmbuild, to .spec not have differences
of .spec in src.rpm like this
rpmbuild -bs flowblade.spec --define "_sourcedir ../srpm-unpacked/" --define
"_srcrpmdir ."
you may define where is the SOURCES dir and where is wrote src.rpm .
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
10:37 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
--- Comment #30 from Klaatu <klaatu(a)straightedgelinux.com> 2013-07-09 00:37:24 CEST
---
(In reply to comment #29)
Created attachment 1126 [details]
package versioning
Hi,
I suggest that you version yours change , like my patch does ,is much more
readable.
other suggestion is build src.rpm with rpmbuild, to .spec not have differences
of .spec in src.rpm like this
rpmbuild -bs flowblade.spec --define "_sourcedir ../srpm-unpacked/" --define
"_srcrpmdir ."
you may define where is the SOURCES dir and where is wrote src.rpm .
patch applied, new src rpm uploaded.
spec:
http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade.spec
source rpm:
http://fedorapeople.org/~klaatu/flowblade/flowblade-0.8.0-4.fc18.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
10:26 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
--- Comment #31 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> 2013-07-11 00:26:42 CEST ---
Hi,
(In reply to comment #30)
patch applied, new src rpm uploaded.
now begins the hard part :)
Issues:
=======
- update-desktop-database is invoked when required
Note: desktop file(s) in flowblade
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache
- Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install if there is
such a file.
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop
I had to do the same with smb4k and if I have time right now, I had do it for
you .
see http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/smb4k.git/tree/smb4k.spec#n42
begins in line 42 to 76
you need use desktop-file-install and update-desktop-database
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
10:09 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #32 from Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> 2015-01-14 23:09:30 CET ---
Closing due to inactivity, please reopen if you're interested in pursuing this
review request.
Amending my standard note above as I'm doing some bugzilla housekeeping. I
would really like to see this in RPM Fusion.
While is is preferable to be sponsored in Fedora first it's not a requirement,
but if you have time, please consider submitting a package there and if you
need help picking a package start here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainers_wishlist?rd=PackageMai...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
10:32 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2855] Review request: flowblade - A fast, efficient video
editor
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2855
Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks|2 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2
[Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
2585
days inactive
4163
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
36 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
RPM Fusion Bugzilla