http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1015 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ivazqueznet(a)gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl&gt; 2009-12-19 14:06:48 --- *** Bug 369 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1015 --- Comment #4 from Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl&gt; 2009-12-21 11:28:05 --- Kevin, thanks for pointing that out, I'll fix that together with any other issues wen a full review is done. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1015 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak(a)v3.sk Blocks|2 |3 AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package- |lkundrak(a)v3.sk |review(a)rpmfusion.org | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1015 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|3 |4 --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk&gt; 2009-12-23 19:04:01 --- * Named and versioned correctly * Spec file clean and legible * Uses correct compiler flags * Filelist sane * Requires/provides sane * License tag ok Needs work: 1.) Please add dependency on liboil-devel configure demands it (though the resulting libraries don't seem to link against it; maybe the liboil dependency can be patched away?). Please note that I was too lazy to do a mockbuild, so you may encounter other missing dependencies upon initial build. I hope that's not a problem. 2.) Please add V=2 parameter to make, so that actual commands are printed (and thus checked for correctness) 3.) RPMlint: gstreamer-plugins-bad-nonfree-debuginfo.i686: E: description-line-too-long This package provides debug information for package gstreamer-plugins-bad-nonfree. Your description lines must not exceed 80 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. APPROVED None of these really block the review, they can be addressed upon commit, along with Kevin's suggestion (which I probably would not notice myself). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1015 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |33 --- Comment #7 from Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl&gt; 2009-12-26 11:43:53 --- Package CVS request ====================== Package Name: gstreamer-plugins-bad-nonfree Short Description: Non-Free GStreamer streaming media framework "bad" plug-ins Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-12 InitialCC: ---------------------- License tag: nonfree -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1015 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #9 from Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl&gt; 2010-01-06 14:29:34 --- Thanks! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1015 --- Comment #11 from Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl&gt; 2010-03-16 16:01:36 --- You should think of gstreamer-plugins-bad as gstreamer-plugins-bad-freeworld now. If we were to restart from scratch the names would be: gstreamer-plugins-bad-free -> gstreamer-plugins-bad gstreamer-plugins-bad -> gstreamer-plugins-bad-freeworld gstreamer-plugins-bad-nonfree -> gstreamer-plugins-bad-nonfree But as rpmfusion already had gstreamer-plugins-bad for the freeworld parts (the parts with free licenses which Fedora cannot ship for other reasons), the names got somewhat obfuscated (to assue a proper upgrade path). So now wee have: gstreamer-plugins-bad-free: Freely licensed plugins with no other legal issues gstreamer-plugins-bad: Freely licensed plugins with other legal issues gstreamer-plugins-nonfree: Non free licensed plugins (with possiblem other legal issues too). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.