Hi, We need to have a mass rebuilt done in per the f26 schedule. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/26/Schedule At this step, I'm waiting for the fedora mass rebuilt to be fully published in order to start the RPM Fusion one. As some packages are still waiting to be signed, and the repository needs to be in sync, I hope to start the RPM Fusion mass rebuilt by the end of the week. If everything goes well, we will branch at the same time as fedora to avoid any surprise (which should be done by the end of the month). We also have an opportunity to start building for ppc64/ppc64le as Fedora uses them in koji. The builders are in place, it's just a matter to enable them in koji. The armhfp builders are still there, so no issue. Unfortunately no aarch64 builders has been found yet. It can still be enabled at a later point. Of course, we will need to report and fix FTBFS. Help will be welcomed in this area. Also while branching, I will be wiring lot of stuff from the infra side. We might need to verify/adapt our tooling for the new branches (rfpkg, packagedb-cli, package groups, etc). Help welcomed here also.

On Qua, 2017-03-01 at 10:00 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > 2017-02-14 10:33 GMT+01:00 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt;: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > We need to have a mass rebuilt done in per the f26 schedule. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/26/Schedule > > > > At this step, I'm waiting for the fedora mass rebuilt to be fully > > published in order to start the RPM Fusion one. As some packages > > are > > still waiting to be signed, and the repository needs to be in > > sync, > > I > > hope to start the RPM Fusion mass rebuilt by the end of the week. > > If everything goes well, we will branch at the same time as > > fedora > > to > > avoid any surprise (which should be done by the end of the > > month). > > > > We also have an opportunity to start building for ppc64/ppc64le > > as > > Fedora uses them in koji. > > The builders are in place, it's just a matter to enable them in > > koji. > > The armhfp builders are still there, so no issue. Unfortunately > > no > > aarch64 builders has been found yet. It can still be enabled at a > > later point. > > > > Of course, we will need to report and fix FTBFS. Help will be > > welcomed > > in this area. > > Also while branching, I will be wiring lot of stuff from the > > infra > > side. We might need to verify/adapt our tooling for the new > > branches > > (rfpkg, packagedb-cli, package groups, etc). Help welcomed here > > also. > > > So given I'm late in running the mass rebuild because various issue > in > the fedora buildroot, I prefer to wait until the development/26 > branch > is published. > I will run the mass rebuild script and branch f26 right after. > > Given Fedora already has f26 branches since yesterday, please try > to > remind that we are not here still. Hi, We already got fedora mock configs for f26 branch , may I processed with build of mock-rpmfusion-free-26 and nonfree packages ? 

https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-26&arch=x86_64   # repo = fedora-26 arch = x86_64 error: invalid repo or arch

Best regards