On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 09:18:28 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2018-07-15 23:59 GMT+02:00 Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com&gt;: > Are you able to run a new-hotness instance locally using your own > bugzilla account ? > Does it work as expected ? Yes. I've tested it locally as per the instructions in the readme, and it works as expected. For example: > [moksha.hub DEBUG] 'BugzillaTicketFiler' thread 140194990606080 | Worker thread picking a message. > [hotness.consumers DEBUG] Received '2018-ed881402-0a81-4710-b7da-7cec4a1256c7' > [hotness.consumers INFO] Handling anitya msg '2018-ed881402-0a81-4710-b7da-7cec4a1256c7' > [hotness.consumers DEBUG] Checking 'https://pdc.fedoraproject.org/rest_api/v1/component-branches/' to see if vala is retired, {'name': 'master', 'global_component': 'vala', 'type': 'rpm', 'active': True} > [hotness.consumers DEBUG] Checking 'https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/raw/master/f/rpms/vala' to see if vala is monitored. > [hotness.consumers DEBUG] Getting pkg info from 'https://apps.fedoraproject.org/mdapi/koji/srcpkg/vala' > [hotness.consumers INFO] Comparing upstream 0.40.8 against repo 0.40.7-1.fc29 > [hotness.consumers INFO] OK, 0.40.8 is newer than 0.40.7-1.fc29 > [bugzilla.bug INFO] Bug 1592463 missing attribute 'bug_status' - doing implicit refresh(). This will be slow, if you want to avoid this, properly use query/getbug include_fields, and set bugzilla.bug_autorefresh = False to force failure. > [hotness.bz INFO] Created bug: #1592463 NEW - <email> - vala-0.40.8 is available > [hotness.bz INFO] Filed new bug 'https://partner-bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592463' > [hotness.consumers INFO] publishing topic 'update.bug.file' > [fedmsg.core DEBUG] Trying to bind to tcp://127.0.0.1:3032 > [fedmsg.core DEBUG] Trying to bind to tcp://127.0.0.1:3033 > [hotness.consumers INFO] Filed Bugzilla #1592463 The filed bug is here: https://partner-bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592463