https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5154 Bug ID: 5154 Summary: Review request: libldac - LDAC library from AOSP Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: gombosg(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free Repo: https://pagure.io/libldac Spec: https://pagure.io/libldac/blob/master/f/libldac.spec SRPM: https://pagure.io/libldac/blob/master/f/libldac-2.0.2.2-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: LDAC library from AOSP. LDAC is an audio coding technology developed by Sony. It enables the transmission of High-Resolution Audio content, even over a Bluetooth connection. pulseaudio-modules-bluetooth-aptx cannot be included in Fedora due to a build dependency on ffmpeg. For compatible headsets, this package enables LDAC encoding over Bluetooth for pulseaudio-modules-bluetooth-aptx. Rpmlint output - spec: 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint output - binary: libldac.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libldacBT_abr.so.2.0.2.2 libldac.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libldacBT_enc.so.2.0.2.2 libldac.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Please let me know if binary stripping is needed and how to do it. The .so file names are libldacBT.so... in the source cmake files, libldac and libldacBT are both used, but IMHO the package should simply be named libldac. This is my first RPM(Fusion) package. I'm looking for a sponsor because of this! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.