10:04 a.m.
Hi,
Please forgive me if this is a known issue:
[asinha@ankur ~]$ sudo yum install mpd --skip-broken
[sudo] password for asinha:
Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package mpd.x86_64 1:0.17.3-3.fc20 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: libavcodec.so.54(LIBAVCODEC_54)(64bit) for package:
1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libavformat.so.54(LIBAVFORMAT_54)(64bit) for package:
1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libavcodec.so.54()(64bit) for package:
1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libavformat.so.54()(64bit) for package:
1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libaudiofile.so.1()(64bit) for package:
1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libmikmod.so.3()(64bit) for package:
1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libid3tag.so.0()(64bit) for package:
1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64
--> Running transaction check
---> Package audiofile.x86_64 1:0.3.6-2.fc20 will be installed
---> Package libid3tag.x86_64 0:0.15.1b-17.fc20 will be installed
---> Package libmikmod.x86_64 0:3.2.0-22.fc20 will be installed
---> Package mpd.x86_64 1:0.17.3-3.fc20 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: libavcodec.so.54(LIBAVCODEC_54)(64bit) for package:
1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libavformat.so.54(LIBAVFORMAT_54)(64bit) for package:
1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libavcodec.so.54()(64bit) for package:
1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libavformat.so.54()(64bit) for package:
1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64
Packages skipped because of dependency problems:
1:audiofile-0.3.6-2.fc20.x86_64 from fedora
libid3tag-0.15.1b-17.fc20.x86_64 from fedora
libmikmod-3.2.0-22.fc20.x86_64 from fedora
1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free-rawhide
[asinha@ankur ~]$
Can I do anything to help fix this? I'd like my mpd server running ;)
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG
5:29 p.m.
On Ter, 2013-09-17 at 20:04 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hi,
Please forgive me if this is a known issue:
Builder as stopped (20 of Aug), so we can't fix it (soon) ... :(
> [asinha@ankur ~]$ sudo yum install mpd --skip-broken
> [sudo] password for asinha:
> Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
> Resolving Dependencies
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package mpd.x86_64 1:0.17.3-3.fc20 will be installed
> --> Processing Dependency: libavcodec.so.54(LIBAVCODEC_54)(64bit) for package:
1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64
> --> Processing Dependency: libavformat.so.54(LIBAVFORMAT_54)(64bit) for package:
1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64
> --> Processing Dependency: libavcodec.so.54()(64bit) for package:
1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64
> --> Processing Dependency: libavformat.so.54()(64bit) for package:
1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64
> --> Processing Dependency: libaudiofile.so.1()(64bit) for package:
1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64
> --> Processing Dependency: libmikmod.so.3()(64bit) for package:
1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64
> --> Processing Dependency: libid3tag.so.0()(64bit) for package:
1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package audiofile.x86_64 1:0.3.6-2.fc20 will be installed
> ---> Package libid3tag.x86_64 0:0.15.1b-17.fc20 will be installed
> ---> Package libmikmod.x86_64 0:3.2.0-22.fc20 will be installed
> ---> Package mpd.x86_64 1:0.17.3-3.fc20 will be installed
> --> Processing Dependency: libavcodec.so.54(LIBAVCODEC_54)(64bit) for package:
1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64
> --> Processing Dependency: libavformat.so.54(LIBAVFORMAT_54)(64bit) for package:
1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64
> --> Processing Dependency: libavcodec.so.54()(64bit) for package:
1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64
> --> Processing Dependency: libavformat.so.54()(64bit) for package:
1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64
>
> Packages skipped because of dependency problems:
> 1:audiofile-0.3.6-2.fc20.x86_64 from fedora
> libid3tag-0.15.1b-17.fc20.x86_64 from fedora
> libmikmod-3.2.0-22.fc20.x86_64 from fedora
> 1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free-rawhide
> [asinha@ankur ~]$
>
Can I do anything to help fix this? I'd like my mpd server running ;)
--
Sérgio M. B.
12:48 a.m.
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 05:34 +1000, David Timms wrote:
How about using a released version aka fedora 19 ?
Excuse me? Is installing an alpha release to help with testing a bad
thing nowadays?
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG
12:56 p.m.
On 18/09/13 10:48, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 05:34 +1000, David Timms wrote:
> How about using a released version aka fedora 19 ?
Excuse me? Is installing an alpha release to help with testing a
bad thing nowadays?
No, definitely not, but you need to decide is it mission critical to
you to have a working package at this moment ? If you can wait for the
issue to be resolved, or assist others in getting it resolved (which I
see you have done), then happily test rawhide release.
David.
12:53 a.m.
Hi Sergio,
On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 18:29 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Builder as stopped (20 of Aug), so we can't fix it (soon) ... :(
Ah! Yikes! :/
I could use mock to build myself newer packages, though, right? Would
you know what packages need to be rebuilt to fix this issue until the
builder is back on? Perhaps a bug URL I can look at?
--
Thanks again,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG
5:32 a.m.
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 10:53 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Ah! Yikes! :/
Known issue:
http://bugs.musicpd.org/view.php?id=3814#bugnotes
I'll see if I can get it to build off git.
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG
7:35 a.m.
New subject: MPD update (Was: Re: Broken dependency: Requires: libavcodec.so.54(LIBAVCODEC_54)(64bit))
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 15:32 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
I'll see if I can get it to build off git.
Well, I got it to build:
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/mpd/mpd.spec
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/mpd/mpd-0.17.5.89d2d64-1.fc21.src.rpm
It'll need a review though. Should I file a bug and add these as
attachments?
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG
12:53 p.m.
New subject: MPD update (Was: Re: Broken dependency: Requires: libavcodec.so.54(LIBAVCODEC_54)(64bit))
On 18/09/13 17:35, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 15:32 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote: It'll need
a
review though. Should I file a bug and add these as attachments?
Check for an existing 'upgrade the package/broken dependency/ffmpeg
/fail to build from source etc' bug first, and if it doesn't already
exist, you can create a new bug.
Do not attach SRPM to the bug. Attach a diff -u from the original spec
to the upgraded spec file. Then the package maintainer can more easily
review the patch, apply the patch and so forth.
If this a package that you would like to help maintain going forward,
and you are already a Fedora packager, you can request to co-maintain
the package. You would then work with the existing maintainer to
decide who has time to look at bugs/upgrades etc..
You mention a successful build. Have you been able to test if the
build actually runs / works etc ?
5:17 p.m.
New subject: MPD update (Was: Re: Broken dependency: Requires: libavcodec.so.54(LIBAVCODEC_54)(64bit))
On Qua, 2013-09-18 at 22:53 +1000, David Timms wrote:
On 18/09/13 17:35, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 15:32 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote: It'll need a
> review though. Should I file a bug and add these as attachments?
Check for an existing 'upgrade the package/broken dependency/ffmpeg
/fail to build from source etc' bug first, and if it doesn't already
exist, you can create a new bug.
Do not attach SRPM to the bug. Attach a diff -u from the original spec
to the upgraded spec file. Then the package maintainer can more easily
review the patch, apply the patch and so forth.
If this a package that you would like to help maintain going forward,
and you are already a Fedora packager, you can request to co-maintain
the package. You would then work with the existing maintainer to
decide who has time to look at bugs/upgrades etc..
You mention a successful build. Have you been able to test if the
build actually runs / works etc ?
we need compile new gpac 0.5.0 package against new ffmpeg , but doesn't
build due a problem in a define [1] that I don't understand if a gcc
incompatibility or what .
After you can rebuild x264, and after that all dependencies , If you
build a koji server and put there sources with cvstogit of Ken Dreyer ,
I could try help you ...
[1] my stupid fix.patch
--- gpac/src/utils/downloader.c.orig 2013-09-02 01:41:55.868809230
+0100
+++ gpac/src/utils/downloader.c 2013-09-02 01:42:19.945048582 +0100
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
#define SESSION_RETRY_COUNT 20
-#define GF_DOWNLOAD_AGENT_NAME "GPAC/" GPAC_FULL_VERSION
+#define GF_DOWNLOAD_AGENT_NAME "GPAC"
//let's be agressive with socket buffer size
#define GF_DOWNLOAD_BUFFER_SIZE 131072
#define GF_WAIT_REPLY_SLEEP 20
--
Sérgio M. B.
7:11 a.m.
New subject: MPD update (Was: Re: Broken dependency: Requires: libavcodec.so.54(LIBAVCODEC_54)(64bit))
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 18:17 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
we need compile new gpac 0.5.0 package against new ffmpeg , but
doesn't
build due a problem in a define [1] that I don't understand if a gcc
incompatibility or what .
Is gpac a requirement for mpd? Doesn't look like it. I just checked the
requires of the latest mpd package in rpmfusion:
[asinha@ankur fedora-packages]$ sudo repoquery --requires mpd
/bin/sh
config(mpd) = 1:0.17.3-3.fc20
libFLAC.so.8()(64bit)
libao.so.4()(64bit)
libao.so.4(LIBAO4_1.1.0)(64bit)
libasound.so.2()(64bit)
libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9)(64bit)
libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9.0)(64bit)
libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9.0rc4)(64bit)
libaudiofile.so.1()(64bit)
libavahi-client.so.3()(64bit)
libavahi-common.so.3()(64bit)
libavahi-glib.so.1()(64bit)
libavcodec.so.54()(64bit)
libavcodec.so.54(LIBAVCODEC_54)(64bit)
libavformat.so.54()(64bit)
libavformat.so.54(LIBAVFORMAT_54)(64bit)
libavutil.so.52()(64bit)
libavutil.so.52(LIBAVUTIL_52)(64bit)
libbz2.so.1()(64bit)
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.10)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.15)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.17)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.9)(64bit)
libcurl.so.4()(64bit)
libdl.so.2()(64bit)
libfaad.so.2()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libid3tag.so.0()(64bit)
libjack.so.0()(64bit)
libm.so.6()(64bit)
libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libmad.so.0()(64bit)
libmikmod.so.3()(64bit)
libmms.so.0()(64bit)
libmodplug.so.1()(64bit)
libmp3lame.so.0()(64bit)
libmpcdec.so.5()(64bit)
libogg.so.0()(64bit)
libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libpulse.so.0()(64bit)
libpulse.so.0(PULSE_0)(64bit)
libsamplerate.so.0()(64bit)
libsamplerate.so.0(libsamplerate.so.0.0)(64bit)
libsamplerate.so.0(libsamplerate.so.0.1)(64bit)
libshout.so.3()(64bit)
libspeex.so.1()(64bit)
libsqlite3.so.0()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
libtheora.so.0()(64bit)
libvorbis.so.0()(64bit)
libvorbisenc.so.2()(64bit)
libvorbisfile.so.3()(64bit)
libwavpack.so.1()(64bit)
libz.so.1()(64bit)
libzzip-0.so.13()(64bit)
rtld(GNU_HASH)
shadow-utils
systemd
[asinha@ankur fedora-packages]$ sudo repoquery --provides gpac
gpac = 0.5.0-4.fc20
gpac(x86-64) = 0.5.0-4.fc20
[asinha@ankur fedora-packages]$ sudo repoquery --provides gpac-libs
gpac-libs = 0.5.0-4.fc20
gpac-libs(x86-64) = 0.5.0-4.fc20
libgpac.so.2()(64bit)
After you can rebuild x264, and after that all dependencies , If you
build a koji server and put there sources with cvstogit of Ken
Dreyer ,
I could try help you ...
I'm slightly confused with this. Why does one need to build a koji
server?
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG
4:52 p.m.
New subject: MPD update (Was: Re: Broken dependency: Requires: libavcodec.so.54(LIBAVCODEC_54)(64bit))
On Qui, 2013-09-19 at 17:11 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Is gpac a requirement for mpd?
gpac is a requirement for x264/ffmpeg mass rebuilds
repoquery --whatrequires gpac-devel-static
give nothing but isn't true , is need to compile x264 is a
BuildRequires: gpac-devel-static, but not in runtime .
gcc -o x264 x264.o input/input.o input/timecode.o input/raw.o
input/y4m.o output/raw.o output/matroska.o output/matroska_ebml.o
output/flv.o output/flv_bytestream.o filters/filters.o
filters/video/video.o filters/video/source.o filters/video/internal.o
filters/video/resize.o filters/video/cache.o filters/video/fix_vfr_pts.o
filters/video/select_every.o filters/video/crop.o filters/video/depth.o
input/avs.o input/thread.o input/lavf.o output/mp4.o libx26410b.so.133
-ldl -lgpac_static -lz -L. -lavformat -lavcodec -lavutil -lswscale
-lswscale -lavutil -m64 -lm -lpthread
Best regards,
Sérgio M. B.
5 p.m.
New subject: MPD update (Was: Re: Broken dependency: Requires: libavcodec.so.54(LIBAVCODEC_54)(64bit))
On Qui, 2013-09-19 at 17:11 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
I'm slightly confused with this. Why does one need to build a koji
server?
repoquery --whatrequires ffmpeg\* --source | grep mpd
mpd-0.17.3-3.fc19.src.rpm
mpd depends on ffmpeg which depends on x264 etc etc , the mass rebuild
x264/ffmeg is not finish .
so we need rebuild a bunch of packages, so a new builder to do it may be
a (temporary) solution (though) .
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
6:56 a.m.
New subject: MPD update (Was: Re: Broken dependency: Requires: libavcodec.so.54(LIBAVCODEC_54)(64bit))
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 22:53 +1000, David Timms wrote:
Check for an existing 'upgrade the package/broken
dependency/ffmpeg
/fail to build from source etc' bug first, and if it doesn't already
exist, you can create a new bug.
Do not attach SRPM to the bug. Attach a diff -u from the original spec
to the upgraded spec file. Then the package maintainer can more easily
review the patch, apply the patch and so forth.
If this a package that you would like to help maintain going forward,
and you are already a Fedora packager, you can request to co-maintain
the package. You would then work with the existing maintainer to
decide who has time to look at bugs/upgrades etc..
Funny story: I was going to go request co-maintainer status but
apparently, I already am a co-maintainer for mpd. I applied and was
approved in the F16 cycle according to this bug. I just seem to have
completely forgotten about it!
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1954
You mention a successful build. Have you been able to test if the
build actually runs / works etc ?
Yep. It works for me here:
[asinha@ankur fedora-packages]$ rpm -q mpd
mpd-0.17.5.89d2d64-1.fc21.x86_64
I'll get in touch with the other maintainers and get this fixed ASAP.
It's a git snapshot that I've packaged, so it's not just a straight
forward update really.
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG
4083
days inactive
4085
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
13 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Agnes Jones -
Ankur Sinha -
Sérgio Basto