On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at> wrote:
Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm wondering which of the three patches I added should also be added
> to the F-14 build.
>
> 1. Fixes gcc 4.6 errors that are warnings for previous versions. While
> obviously not required, I would think it would be good to fix "bad
> code".
>
> 2. Fixes x264 for the F-15 version but is backwards compatible with F-14.
>
> 3. Fixes a potential crash.
>
> I think #1 probably, #2 maybe, and #3 definitely.
>
> Is there value in keeping the builds as similar as possible (same
> spec, same patches, etc.)? I would think it would make things easier
> on the maintainer.
I'd just copy the specfile wholesale and build the F14 update from the exact
same specfile. That's how I usually work.
Thanks, I was wondering what current practices are (or if there's much
standardization). Since F13 is still officially supported and I
verified I got a good mock build then I should do the same for F13 as
well?
Thanks,
Richard