12:44 p.m.
Hi,
seems I've missed something ... I wanted to prepare an update for
qmmp-plugins-freeworld but I've found the cvs is missing the EL-6
dir (oh, and the package is missing from the repo obviously - hm,
maybe I'd have noticed earlier if I wouldn't install new versions
for testing manually on my RHEL machine :-))
The branching wasn't done automagically on RHEL6 release?
Or is this a bug?
Should I re-open the review bug with new CVS Request or what? -
The docs at rpmfusion.org are not much verbose on the topic of
branches ...
K.
--
Karel Volný
QE BaseOs/Daemons Team
Red Hat Czech, Brno
tel. +420 532294274
(RH: +420 532294111 ext. 8262074)
xmpp kavol(a)jabber.cz
:: "Never attribute to malice what can
:: easily be explained by stupidity."
1:18 p.m.
2011/8/25 Karel Volný <kvolny(a)redhat.com>:
Should I re-open the review bug with new CVS Request or what? -
The docs at rpmfusion.org are not much verbose on the topic of
branches ...
Yeah, the docs on the wiki could be clearer, but for now they are at
http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors/CVSRequests, "Package Change
Requests for existing packages".
Do you have the existing review bug handy for qmmp-plugins-freeworld?
I couldn't find one.
- Ken
11:26 a.m.
On Thursday 25 of August 2011 15:18:38 Ken Dreyer wrote:
2011/8/25 Karel Volný <kvolny(a)redhat.com>:
> Should I re-open the review bug with new CVS Request or
> what? - The docs at rpmfusion.org are not much verbose on
> the topic of branches ...
Yeah, the docs on the wiki could be clearer, but for now they
are at http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors/CVSRequests,
"Package Change Requests for existing packages".
ah, I've missed that link, I found only what kwizart has linked
Do you have the existing review bug handy for
qmmp-plugins-freeworld? I couldn't find one.
well, no ... I forgot, no review, it was imported directly from
Livna
so I've created new bug
On Thursday 25 of August 2011 16:10:19 Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2011/8/25 Karel Volný <kvolny(a)redhat.com>:
The branching is done for EL-6 only if there is already an
EL-5 branch.
yes, it existed ...
[kvolny@kvolny qmmp-plugins-freeworld]$ cvs log EL-5/branch
RCS file: /cvs/free/rpms/qmmp-plugins-freeworld/EL-5/branch,v
Working file: EL-5/branch
head: 1.1
branch:
locks: strict
access list:
symbolic names:
qmmp-plugins-freeworld-0_2_3-3_el5: 1.1
keyword substitution: kv
total revisions: 1; selected revisions: 1
description:
----------------------------
revision 1.1
date: 2009/01/15 18:16:48; author: thl; state: Exp;
Initialize branch EL-5 for qmmp-plugins-freeworld
=============================================================================
... more than year before EL6
K.
--
Karel Volný
QE BaseOs/Daemons Team
Red Hat Czech, Brno
tel. +420 532294274
(RH: +420 532294111 ext. 8262074)
xmpp kavol(a)jabber.cz
:: "Never attribute to malice what can
:: easily be explained by stupidity."
2:10 p.m.
2011/8/25 Karel Volný <kvolny(a)redhat.com>:
Hi,
seems I've missed something ... I wanted to prepare an update for
qmmp-plugins-freeworld but I've found the cvs is missing the EL-6
dir (oh, and the package is missing from the repo obviously - hm,
maybe I'd have noticed earlier if I wouldn't install new versions
for testing manually on my RHEL machine :-))
The branching wasn't done automagically on RHEL6 release?
Or is this a bug?
Should I re-open the review bug with new CVS Request or what? -
The docs at rpmfusion.org are not much verbose on the topic of
branches ...
Hi,
The branching is done for EL-6 only if there is already an EL-5 branch.
If not, then you can request such branch(es) blocking #33.
http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#head-8354059095aca6ccb5494f9dac8815b732...
Nicolas (kwizart)
4871
days inactive
4872
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Karel Volný -
Ken Dreyer -
Nicolas Chauvet