1:27 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Miro fails its build during the check phase on Fedora 16:
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=12172
but succeeds when built locally on my mock instance. However, it does
trigger some warnings:
Mock Version: 1.1.21
INFO: Mock Version: 1.1.21
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled yum cache
State Changed: cleaning yum metadata
INFO: enabled ccache
State Changed: running yum
State Changed: creating cache
State Changed: unlock buildroot
INFO: Installed packages:
State Changed: setup
State Changed: build
INFO: Done(./miro-4.0.6-2.fc16.src.rpm)
Config(fedora-16-x86_64-rpmfusion_free) 18 minutes 52 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-16-x86_64/result
State Changed: end
WARNING: Process ID 25265 still running in chroot. Killing...
WARNING: Process ID 25329 still running in chroot. Killing...
Are these two related? And any idea how to debug this? I could make
the test script more verbose, I suppose.
Thanks,
- --
Michel Alexandre Salim
Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/
Email: salimma(a)fedoraproject.org | GPG key ID: A36A937A
Jabber: hircus(a)jabber.ccc.de | IRC: hircus(a)irc.freenode.net
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPUMqwAAoJEEr1VKujapN6hIwIAJFKtTLxG3rISYYma+9JaeIl
uOSwD9mmmLDIc0rIQmTVgaDZL0oZp06/yb+oSkRiqFIAY1nDnEpO/t0XZCbiyyUZ
CZ/0LPXWG6JxVbDjse1hgYl/wpLf71giON5lecZvEEZe83vLeQqWoL54E0sd5ZMO
wnukMzJyxvrIw2XnMb1GvOg2V2qWw3+Lkby6v9TkfEdQq6JS4vpVx589SNRcPzVm
D+tdHljVFfIx8CyZSXzHrykkAw5PwM73SwKH05ap0EexL0dY3haQ08qkSypuU8sS
ZOyTBBQ/QT/BLUTvCJbffqOVjSGKNudsb7goSFWLJU+0BxOCwvj2rAv+DCIT1bE=
=eCXw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
5:08 p.m.
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 20:27 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Miro fails its build during the check phase on Fedora 16:
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=12172
but succeeds when built locally on my mock instance. However, it does
trigger some warnings:
+ xvfb-run -a -w 1 ./test.sh
RPM build errors:
The error seems in xvfb-run , this command "xvfb-run -a -w 1 ./test.sh"
to run as a test (though).
Mock Version: 1.1.21
INFO: Mock Version: 1.1.21
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled yum cache
State Changed: cleaning yum metadata
INFO: enabled ccache
State Changed: running yum
State Changed: creating cache
State Changed: unlock buildroot
INFO: Installed packages:
State Changed: setup
State Changed: build
INFO: Done(./miro-4.0.6-2.fc16.src.rpm)
Config(fedora-16-x86_64-rpmfusion_free) 18 minutes 52 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-16-x86_64/result
State Changed: end
WARNING: Process ID 25265 still running in chroot. Killing...
WARNING: Process ID 25329 still running in chroot. Killing...
Are these two related? And any idea how to debug this? I could make
the test script more verbose, I suppose.
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
5:32 p.m.
New subject: text correction Re: Would unterminated processes cause RPMfusion build to fail?
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 17:08 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 20:27 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Miro fails its build during the check phase on Fedora 16:
>
> http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=12172
>
> but succeeds when built locally on my mock instance. However, it
does
> trigger some warnings:
+ xvfb-run -a -w 1 ./test.sh
RPM build errors:
The error seems in xvfb-run , this command "xvfb-run -a -w
1 ./test.sh"
is odd
to run as a test (though).
--
Sérgio M. B.
3:24 a.m.
New subject: text correction Re: Would unterminated processes cause RPMfusion build to fail?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/2012 12:32 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 17:08 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 20:27 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
>
>> Miro fails its build during the check phase on Fedora 16:
>>
>> http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=12172
>>
>> but succeeds when built locally on my mock instance. However,
>> it
> does
>> trigger some warnings:
>
> + xvfb-run -a -w 1 ./test.sh RPM build errors:
>
> The error seems in xvfb-run , this command "xvfb-run -a -w 1
> ./test.sh"
is odd
> to run as a test (though).
The tests involve importing some libraries that fail
if DISPLAY is not
set, thus the reason for using xvfb-run. The same tests run fine on my
local mock set up.
And, to my original hypothesis, the failures are not due to the
unterminated processes -- I applied a patch from the trunk sourcecode
that fixes that issue, and RPM Fusion's mock still failed.
Disabling the tests for now (unless building with --with check, so I
can still run the tests manually before submitting an official build)
but this is really odd.
- --
Michel Alexandre Salim
Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/
Email: salimma(a)fedoraproject.org | GPG key ID: A36A937A
Jabber: hircus(a)jabber.ccc.de | IRC: hircus(a)irc.freenode.net
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPUY72AAoJEEr1VKujapN6bJIH/RlpgSR7xOHOlhXd5fwa7R2S
obdJvc/HkRHu1stGaTAAlgyMiyZ+BeFsjOEd37YEmkiLxrS6ktuL9xtiOnOeSPQg
iHcWJin6A3ciTiOAKJrZ4KVzo6C9ywxBBxiiwe8OZ0obch8MOQArL3i3Jx1i5P61
xioIu8zHPW3JCMQn0H0d/72yX+s3kM/gU4qL2Wx18Lp9/skJpYdEnYpp7D4XJQNv
SZqks+j8UiXlypVuVqtUyyYN8uj9QIFPMXaZN0bSbQo7ynaTdvdRQbhCVT+Ks1By
IByWT+Hku2AjTRZtrNv7Wf2khG9MRYGuu6DsIP5eZbFNUlX8uZZwZzl2llO78OA=
=4A25
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
6:13 p.m.
New subject: text correction Re: Would unterminated processes cause RPMfusion build to fail?
On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 10:24 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On 03/03/2012 12:32 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 17:08 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>> On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 20:27 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
>>
>>> Miro fails its build during the check phase on Fedora 16:
>>>
>>> http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=12172
>>>
>>> but succeeds when built locally on my mock instance. However,
>>> it
>> does
>>> trigger some warnings:
>>
>> + xvfb-run -a -w 1 ./test.sh RPM build errors:
>>
>> The error seems in xvfb-run , this command "xvfb-run -a -w 1
>> ./test.sh"
>
> is odd
>
>> to run as a test (though).
The tests involve importing some libraries that fail if DISPLAY is not
set, thus the reason for using xvfb-run. The same tests run fine on my
local mock set up.
But if it fail and we don't know why , we need logs of xvfb-run to know
whats happen , whats is odd ( for me of course) is this test when fail,
don't have logs about what happened.
And, to my original hypothesis, the failures are not due to the
unterminated processes -- I applied a patch from the trunk sourcecode
that fixes that issue, and RPM Fusion's mock still failed.
Disabling the tests for now (unless building with --with check, so I
can still run the tests manually before submitting an official build)
but this is really odd.
Let me know if builds after disable the tests.
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
3:22 p.m.
New subject: text correction Re: Would unterminated processes cause RPMfusion build to fail?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/04/2012 01:13 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 10:24 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> The tests involve importing some libraries that fail if DISPLAY
> is not set, thus the reason for using xvfb-run. The same tests
> run fine on my local mock set up.
But if it fail and we don't know why , we need logs of xvfb-run to
know whats happen , whats is odd ( for me of course) is this test
when fail, don't have logs about what happened.
> And, to my original hypothesis, the failures are not due to the
> unterminated processes -- I applied a patch from the trunk
> sourcecode that fixes that issue, and RPM Fusion's mock still
> failed.
>
> Disabling the tests for now (unless building with --with check,
> so I can still run the tests manually before submitting an
> official build) but this is really odd.
Let me know if builds after disable the tests.
It does build when the tests are disabled, since %check is actually
performed after installation has succeeded, so the only way for the
build to fail at that point is if the file listings are incomplete.
Best regards,
- --
Michel Alexandre Salim
Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/
Email: salimma(a)fedoraproject.org | GPG key ID: A36A937A
Jabber: hircus(a)jabber.ccc.de | IRC: hircus(a)irc.freenode.net
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPWM6oAAoJEEr1VKujapN6MWAH/AzkPhaknk5IWuGe0HZ/Ve7S
95UQY0y7WgEUV7hIH0TjbBlC+ZSv042CZh+ltf3Ml0jOS00BswE0VADU2Cx0s6gF
ldjIjzZFMdz7gm8ok7+isV28qPRsZEAzXseDyBndQMWzxsdYO2S2tkghB2uLXZQL
2Af97DCiGGu2C3WvQwUR9+y/zVZJfH6xKFVd8PAwfTQtRtxdk7DUt++hZZoc9J69
KenIfDsE3qRli//O8shBjHcDivMcGW6/VDV1+Fc+ucgKWXGi1kaHF7WpMhsEnBl7
iV7qCLTb6Zogm9MiPBuv6rdI46V5xFBWCRE6dxtjdoVNPggBHpHuPST+ZOTl/co=
=71ZC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
4:39 p.m.
New subject: text correction Re: Would unterminated processes cause RPMfusion build to fail?
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 22:22 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On 03/04/2012 01:13 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 10:24 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
>> The tests involve importing some libraries that fail if DISPLAY
>> is not set, thus the reason for using xvfb-run. The same tests
>> run fine on my local mock set up.
>
>
> But if it fail and we don't know why , we need logs of xvfb-run to
> know whats happen , whats is odd ( for me of course) is this test
> when fail, don't have logs about what happened.
>
>
>> And, to my original hypothesis, the failures are not due to the
>> unterminated processes -- I applied a patch from the trunk
>> sourcecode that fixes that issue, and RPM Fusion's mock still
>> failed.
>>
>> Disabling the tests for now (unless building with --with check,
>> so I can still run the tests manually before submitting an
>> official build) but this is really odd.
>
> Let me know if builds after disable the tests.
>
It does build when the tests are disabled, since %check is actually
performed after installation has succeeded, so the only way for the
build to fail at that point is if the file listings are incomplete.
Maybe is a security issue , a build root is not exactly same as your
system, for example in build root uname -a (the kernel) is the host not
the guset (build root one) , so some things like run a xserver, could be
block by security issues, or xorg-x11 may be not compatible with host
kernel etc.
So a way to know what errors xvfb-run have, is the way to solve this
issue .
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
4:24 p.m.
New subject: text correction Re: Would unterminated processes cause RPMfusion build to fail?
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 22:22 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On 03/04/2012 01:13 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 10:24 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
>> The tests involve importing some libraries that fail if DISPLAY
>> is not set, thus the reason for using xvfb-run. The same tests
>> run fine on my local mock set up.
>
>
> But if it fail and we don't know why , we need logs of xvfb-run to
> know whats happen , whats is odd ( for me of course) is this test
> when fail, don't have logs about what happened.
>
>
>> And, to my original hypothesis, the failures are not due to the
>> unterminated processes -- I applied a patch from the trunk
>> sourcecode that fixes that issue, and RPM Fusion's mock still
>> failed.
>>
>> Disabling the tests for now (unless building with --with check,
>> so I can still run the tests manually before submitting an
>> official build) but this is really odd.
>
> Let me know if builds after disable the tests.
>
It does build when the tests are disabled, since %check is actually
performed after installation has succeeded, so the only way for the
build to fail at that point is if the file listings are incomplete.
though that wiki
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Testing#Testing_graphical_packag...
Testing graphical packages with mock and Xnest
could help you, somehow
the tread of this matter begins here :
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-April/166115.html
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
4:33 p.m.
New subject: text correction Re: Would unterminated processes cause RPMfusion build to fail?
2012/4/26 Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com>:
though that wiki
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Testing#Testing_graphical_packag...
Testing graphical packages with mock and Xnest
could help you, somehow
As I'm the author of the above wiki link, please let me know if this
helps you or if updates/changes/additions would be helpful.
Thanks,
Richard
4598
days inactive
4653
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
8 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Michel Alexandre Salim -
Richard Shaw -
Sérgio Basto