10:05 p.m.
I've been thinking if there's any interest in creating a testing
community within rpmfusion
If there is any interest....
Hows accessible is wiki?
How good is the work between maintainers and upstream ?
Is it possible to get a test list ?
Johann "Probably should sleep some more" Gudmundsson
10:30 p.m.
HI!.
I'm interesting to make it part of the team, i do not know so much of
linux, but i'm very interesting it.
Salu2..
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 7:05 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
<johannbg(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
I've been thinking if there's any interest in creating a
testing community
within rpmfusion
If there is any interest....
Hows accessible is wiki?
How good is the work between maintainers and upstream ?
Is it possible to get a test list ?
Johann "Probably should sleep some more" Gudmundsson
5:39 p.m.
On 14.10.2008 00:05, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
I've been thinking if there's any interest in creating a
testing
community within rpmfusion
If there is any interest....
Hows accessible is wiki?
I can't remember exactly, but I think you can edit if once you
registered (and if not then it should be like that (round about)).
How good is the work between maintainers and upstream ?
Just like in Fedora. Or IOW: It completely depends on the maintainer and
the package.
Is it possible to get a test list ?
That is something I have been thinking about as well. One one hand I'd
say "yes, might make sense". OTOH: fedora-test-list often does not work
to well. Some people report things there, others to fedora-devel, yet
others to fedora-list -- and most of the time bugzilla would have been
the right place.
So right now I tend a bit more to "just use rpmfusion-users for that
purpose for now; we can create a seperate list later if one really is
needed"
CU
knurd
9:45 p.m.
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 14.10.2008 00:05, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> I've been thinking if there's any interest in creating a testing
> community within rpmfusion
>
> If there is any interest....
>
> Hows accessible is wiki?
I can't remember exactly, but I think you can edit if once you
registered (and if not then it should be like that (round about)).
Ok . I'll check it out.
> How good is the work between maintainers and upstream ?
Just like in Fedora. Or IOW: It completely depends on the maintainer
and the package.
Good to hear.
> Is it possible to get a test list ?
That is something I have been thinking about as well. One one hand I'd
say "yes, might make sense". OTOH: fedora-test-list often does not
work to well. Some people report things there, others to fedora-devel,
yet others to fedora-list -- and most of the time bugzilla would have
been the right place.
I've been trying to get developers to kick test reports/issues to the
test-list on fedora..
I will further push that issue on next qa meeting.
So right now I tend a bit more to "just use rpmfusion-users for
that
purpose for now; we can create a seperate list later if one really is
needed"
Let's see how it goes first then.
It would be good if maintainers could create a wiki page with info on
how to get the info they want ( debug output ) and which files (
logfiles etc )
they want on reports reports in bugzilla. That should eliminate any
need for some kind of triage-ing..
JBG
5:30 a.m.
On 14.10.2008 23:45, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 14.10.2008 00:05, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
[...]
It would be good if maintainers could create a wiki page with info on
how to get the info they want ( debug output ) and which files (
logfiles etc )
they want on reports reports in bugzilla. That should eliminate any
need for some kind of triage-ing..
What really is overdue imho are some pages that describe the graphics
drivers packages better. Some things that come to my mind:
- mention the main differences between a stock driver install and our
packaging (like file-locations); also mention why we (have to) do that
and why it's a good thing to do that/to use our drivers
- mention the dangers that people might run into if they use the normal
driver install
- mention how to debug problems
-- is the kmod avilable for the running kernel and loads (dmesg output)
-- is the driver properly configured in /etc/X11/xorg.conf
-- ...
- a note that we we can only fix bugs in the packaging, and can't fix
bugs in the drivers, as they area closed
- a note why some drivers are missing for F9 and rawhide
CU
knurd
5884
days inactive
5886
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" -
Mario Chacon -
Thorsten Leemhuis