12:46 p.m.
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44
Summary: Review Request: cryptopp - Free C++ class library of
cryptographic schemes
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Despite the License claims this code is in Public Domain
mars.cpp bundles code patented by IBM
There is a problem while building this package on i386 that nees to have
-DCRYPTOPP_DISABLE_SSE2. (or removes -fPIC but using -fPIC is desirable for a
shared built). It could be possible to have this options inherited as the
CFLAGS for building the dependencies on i386.
SRPMS:
http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/testing/9/SRPMS/cryptopp-5.5.2-3.fc9.kwiza...
SPECS:
http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/cryptopp/cryptopp.spec
Description: Free C++ class library of cryptographic schemes
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
1:14 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 44] Review Request: cryptopp - Free C++ class library of cryptographic schemes
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44
NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |2
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
2:32 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 44] Review Request: cryptopp - Free C++ class library of cryptographic schemes
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik(a)greysector.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dominik(a)greysector.net
--- Comment #1 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik(a)greysector.net>
2008-09-17 16:32:13 ---
FWIW you can try building this twice during the build process, once with SSE2,
once without and putting sse2-enabled libs into %{_libdir}/sse2. The linker
will find the appropriate version for your CPU automatically. See for example
atlas package in Fedora.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
3:02 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 44] Review Request: cryptopp - Free C++ class library of cryptographic schemes
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44
--- Comment #2 from NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> 2008-09-17 17:02:24 ---
That's an interesting case for sse2 and atlas. But clearly i do not plan to
have this feature enabled in this case.
There no reason to have sse2 enabled on i386 since we need to make a choice
between -fPIC and sse2. and using Position independant code will be better on
x86 for a "big" shared library and it will be possible to use prelink on it
(whereas it isn't with nonpic library).
Furthermore, dependencies building will not fail with "trying to link against
x86_32 code, needs to recompile with -fPIC."
Testing case for this package was amule (tested on x86 and x86_64).
But was only tested at buildtime. Test at runtime would be nice.
According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64
Every x86_64 cpu have sse2 already. so it doesn't worth the case to disable it.
Package also built fine on ppc ppc64
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
7:51 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 44] Review Request: cryptopp - Free C++ class library of cryptographic schemes
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44
Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |opensource(a)till.name
--- Comment #3 from Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name> 2008-09-30 09:51:49 ---
FYI: There is a review request for this at Fedora's Bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462104
If this package is not suited for Fedora, please explain why.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
8:20 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 44] Review Request: cryptopp - Free C++ class library of cryptographic schemes
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44
--- Comment #4 from NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> 2008-09-30 10:20:00 ---
Despite the License claims this code is in Public Domain
mars.cpp bundles code >>patented<<< by IBM
That been said the fedora
version have the problematic code removed (by a
patch)
if usability of dependent application can be proved, I will close this review
request. Until then, the review is in waiting...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
8:35 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 44] Review Request: cryptopp - Free C++ class library of cryptographic schemes
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44
NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks|2 |
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #5 from NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> 2008-10-27 21:35:48 ---
Package has been approved in Fedora.
closing this bug as won't fix
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
5872
days inactive
5912
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
6 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
RPM Fusion Bugzilla