5:45 a.m.
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on
Rails deployment system
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: kanarip(a)kanarip.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Estimated Hours: 0.0
SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-passenger.spec
SRPM:
http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f10/SRPMS/rubygem-passenger-2.0.6-2.fc10.sr...
Description:
Phusion Passenger is a deployment system for Ruby on Rails
applications on Apache, i.e. a 'mod_rails'. Rails deployment becomes an
"upload
& done" process.
No eligible for inclusion to Fedora, because:
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696#c7 (incompatible
licenses in the sources). No response or action from upstream parties.
rpmlint output:
[jmeeuwen@ghandalf result]$ rpmlint *.rpm
mod_passenger.i386: W: no-documentation
mod_passenger.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_passenger.so 0775
rubygem-passenger.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-linux/passenger/native_support.so 0775
rubygem-passenger.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.0.6/lib/passenger/ApplicationPoolServerExecutable
0775
rubygem-passenger.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-2.0.6/bin/passenger-config
rubygem-passenger.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/bin/passenger-config
rubygem-passenger-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
rubygem-passenger-doc.i386: W: no-documentation
6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 5 warnings.
- These I will fix as soon as I can, except for:
rubygem-passenger.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/bin/passenger-config
The file is not a devel file
This is my first RPMFusion package
I am a Fedora Packager:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/kanarip
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5:45 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 437] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437
Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip(a)kanarip.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |2
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
6:29 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 437] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437
--- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at> 2009-03-15 07:29:31 ---
Unfortunately, that sounds just plain illegal to distribute, in RPM Fusion or
anywhere else.
(That said, so is kmod-nvidia which RPM Fusion is happily shipping.)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
4:45 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 437] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437
--- Comment #2 from Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info> 2009-03-15 17:45:29
---
(In reply to comment #1)
Unfortunately, that sounds just plain illegal to distribute, in RPM
Fusion or
anywhere else.
I tend to agree based on what spot said in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696#c7
(That said, so is kmod-nvidia which RPM Fusion is happily shipping.)
proprietary kernel-modules might be in a similar area as above problem, but
from a quick look I'd say it's quite a different case because kernel modules
like kmod-nvidia
* are shipped independently of the kernel
* are seen as something like plugins by some people as the modules talk to the
kernel via an exported interface(¹)
So both things are not really comparable afaics (relying on the information
from above quoted comment here again; I didn't take a closer look myself).
(¹) please note that this does not mean that something like that is my option
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
10:27 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 437] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437
--- Comment #3 from Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip(a)kanarip.com> 2009-03-15 23:27:19
---
Are we saying this package cannot go into RPMFusion either?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7:20 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 437] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437
--- Comment #4 from Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info> 2009-03-16 08:20:19
---
(In reply to comment #3)
Are we saying this package cannot go into RPMFusion either?
RPM Fusion only ships software which is legally distributable (that's for
example why we don't ship flash-plugin or adobe reader, as their licenses don't
allow re-distribution).
In the rubygem-passenger case only open-source licenses are involved. But that
doesn't make any difference at all afaics, as the different licenses in this
mixed form don't allow distribution of the product, hence *I*'d say we shozuld
not ship it.
That option is based on spot's comments. If he is wrong: Tell us. Or check how
other distributions (Debian would be a good example!) handle this package.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
10:18 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 437] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437
Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip(a)kanarip.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #5 from Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip(a)kanarip.com> 2009-03-16 11:18:25
---
I agree with Spot and you, and I think it's fair enough; no argument here. I'll
continue with the FP in an attempt to ship the GPL-licensed rubygem-passenger
without the mod_passenger (partly CNRI licensed).
Not sure how to close this bug, I was looking for DEFERRED ;-)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
2:15 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 437] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437
Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hobbes1069(a)gmail.com
Blocks|2 |
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
4795
days inactive
5730
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
7 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
RPM Fusion Bugzilla