1:35 p.m.
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3601
Bug #: 3601
Summary: Review request: spread - High performance messaging
service
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: holcapek(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
- spec file:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/holcapek/spread-rpm/master/spread.spec
- src rpm:
https://github.com/holcapek/spread-rpm/raw/master/spread-4.2.0-1.fc21.src...
- descriptoion (common to main package and all subpackages):
Spread is an open source toolkit that can be used in many distributed
applications that require high reliability, high performance, and robust
communication among various subsets of members. The toolkit is designed
to encapsulate the challenging aspects of asynchronous networks and
enable the construction of reliable and scalable distributed applications.
- why not in Fedora:
Spread Open-Source License is not considered a Good License, see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077081#c9
- is this my first rpmfusion package
no, I've already filed another package:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3600
- am I seeking a sponsor:
no, I am Fedora sponsored packager
- rpmlint on src rpm:
spread.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable,
callable, calculable
this is exactly what http://www.spread.org/ reads
spread.src:
W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License
this is why Fedora don't accept the package
spread.src: W:
invalid-url Source0: spread-src-4.2.0.tar.gz
source tarball cannot be downloaded directly, only through a web form
- rpmlint on rpms:
spread.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable,
callable, calculable
dtto as above
spread.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open
Source License
dtto as above
spread-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license
Spread Open Source License
dtto as above
spread-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error
%description -l en_US scalable ->
salable, callable, calculable
dtto as above
spread-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread
Open Source License
dtto as above
spread-devel.x86_64: W:
only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
-devel only contains unversioned .so, which is a symlink to versioned
.so in -libs
spread-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning
/usr/share/man/man3/SP_multicast.3.gz 28: warning: macro `TB' not defined
no idea, suggestions welcome
spread-devel.x86_64: W:
manual-page-warning
/usr/share/man/man3/FL_multicast.3.gz 50: warning: macro `TB' not defined
no idea, suggestions welcome
spread-libs.x86_64: W:
spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable ->
salable, callable, calculable
dtto as above
spread-libs.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread
Open Source License
dtto as above
spread-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit
/usr/lib64/libspread.so.3.0.0
exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
let's believe the upstream they know what they're doing
spread-static.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable ->
salable, callable, calculable
dtto as above
spread-static.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread
Open Source License
dtto as above
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1:36 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 3601] Review request: spread - High performance messaging service
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3601
Jan Holcapek <holcapek(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |holcapek(a)gmail.com
Blocks| |2
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5:26 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 3601] Review request: spread - High performance messaging service
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3601
Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |lkundrak(a)v3.sk
Blocks|2 |3
AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package-review@rp |lkundrak(a)v3.sk
|mfusion.org |
--- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk> 2015-04-22 19:26:57 CEST ---
Taking this for a review.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
3:10 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 3601] Review request: spread - High performance messaging service
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3601
Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Blocks|3 |4
--- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk> 2015-04-27 17:10:39 CEST ---
Looks well, overall. All concerns from the Fedora review were addressed and the
package is nicely aligned with the guidelines and good practices. Thank you!
APPROVED
A few nitpicks to consider before importing the package:
Please %exclude /usr/share/doc/spread/Win32BuildInstructions.pdf from the
package.
I'm a bit worried about these; would it be possible to use /usr/include/spread/
instead?
%{_includedir}/fl.h
%{_includedir}/sp.h
%{_includedir}/sp_events.h
%{_includedir}/sp_func.h
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:12 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 3601] Review request: spread - High performance messaging service
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3601
--- Comment #3 from Jan Holcapek <holcapek(a)gmail.com> 2015-04-29 14:12:52 CEST ---
Thanks for reviewing the package.
(In reply to comment #2)
Please %exclude /usr/share/doc/spread/Win32BuildInstructions.pdf from
the
package.
Fixed.
I'm a bit worried about these; would it be possible to use
/usr/include/spread/
instead?
Fixed.
- spec file:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/holcapek/spread-rpm/master/spread.spec
- src rpm:
https://github.com/holcapek/spread-rpm/raw/master/spread-4.2.0-2.fc21.src...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9:19 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 3601] Review request: spread - High performance messaging service
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3601
Jan Holcapek <holcapek(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks|4 |33
--- Comment #4 from Jan Holcapek <holcapek(a)gmail.com> 2015-05-01 11:19:49 CEST ---
Package CVS request
======================
Package Name: spread
Short Description: High performance messaging service
Owners: holcapek(a)gmail.com
Branches: F-20 F-21 EL-6
InitialCC:
----------------------
License tag: free
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8:58 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 3601] Review request: spread - High performance messaging service
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3601
--- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk> 2015-05-04 10:58:33 CEST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Package CVS request
======================
Package Name: spread
Short Description: High performance messaging service
Owners: holcapek(a)gmail.com
Branches: F-20 F-21 EL-6
InitialCC:
----------------------
License tag: free
^^^^ free? I though the package was rejected from
Fedora because the license is non-free!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10:05 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 3601] Review request: spread - High performance messaging service
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3601
leigh scott <leigh123linux(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |leigh123linux(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from leigh scott <leigh123linux(a)gmail.com> 2015-05-04 12:05:50 CEST
---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
> Package CVS request
> ======================
> Package Name: spread
> Short Description: High performance messaging service
> Owners: holcapek(a)gmail.com
> Branches: F-20 F-21 EL-6
> InitialCC:
> ----------------------
> License tag: free
^^^^ free? I though the package was rejected from
Fedora because the license is non-free!
Free refers to the rpmfusion repo!
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7:29 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 3601] Review request: spread - High performance messaging service
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3601
--- Comment #7 from Jan Holcapek <holcapek(a)gmail.com> 2015-05-04 21:29:09 CEST ---
Package CVS request
======================
Package Name: spread
Short Description: High performance messaging service
Owners: holcapek(a)gmail.com
Branches: F-20 F-21 EL-6
InitialCC:
----------------------
License tag: nonfree
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7:36 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 3601] Review request: spread - High performance messaging service
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3601
--- Comment #8 from Jan Holcapek <holcapek(a)gmail.com> 2015-05-04 21:36:35 CEST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
> Package CVS request
> ======================
> Package Name: spread
> Short Description: High performance messaging service
> Owners: holcapek(a)gmail.com
> Branches: F-20 F-21 EL-6
> InitialCC:
> ----------------------
> License tag: free
^^^^ free? I though the package was rejected from
Fedora because the license is non-free!
Sorry, you are of course right.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8:56 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 3601] Review request: spread - High performance messaging service
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3601
Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks|33 |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8:12 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 3601] Review request: spread - High performance messaging service
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3601
Jan Holcapek <holcapek(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on| |3644
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10:42 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 3601] Review request: spread - High performance messaging service
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3601
Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on|3644 |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3:06 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 3601] Review request: spread - High performance messaging
service
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3601
Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
namespace| |nonfree
Resolution|--- |EXPIRED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2642
days inactive
3507
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
13 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
RPM Fusion Bugzilla