http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104
Stewart Adam <s.adam(a)diffingo.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Stewart Adam <s.adam(a)diffingo.com> 2008-11-06 16:09:42 ---
+ source files match upstream
+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license field matches the actual license.
+ license text included in package.
+ latest version is being packaged.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ compiler flags are appropriate.
+ %clean is present.
+ package builds properly.
+ package installs properly.
+ debuginfo package looks complete.
- rpmlint is silent.
--> Lots of messages, here are the ones that need fixing:
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-newest.src: W: strange-permission
nvidia-newest-config-display 0775
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-newest.src: W: strange-permission filter-requires.sh 0775
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-newest.src: W: strange-permission nvidia-newest-init 0775
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-newest.src: W: strange-permission
nvidia-newest-README.Fedora 0775
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-newest.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/nvidia/libglx.so
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-newest.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long hardware
accelerated rendering with NVIDIA chipsets NV40 (GeForce6 series) and newer.
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-newest.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 177.80-2
['177.80-1.fc9', '177.80-1']
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-newest-devel.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long This
package provides the development files of the xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-newest
package,
- final provides and requires are sane:
--> We're providing libGL.so.1 and libGLcore.so.1 - see bug 122
--> Main package must "Require: livna-config-display >= 0.0.22" so that
the
initscripts work properly
--> -devel package should require -libs package - see bug 122
+ owns the directories it creates.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ code, not content.
+ documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
+ headers are in a -devel subpackage.
+ no pkgconfig files.
+ no libtool .la droppings.
+ desktop files valid and installed properly.
Same comments as in bug 122 about FreshRPMs and FC5 modprobe.d...
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.