As I recently got abi-compliance-checker into stable for Fedora I was going to check the current package against the 0.2.1 release but had a problem compiling it. I started with the current SRPM and did a minimal update on the spec file. Buildfile: libbluray/bdj/build.xml does not exist! Build failed I verified that the file indeed does not exist. Did I miss something? I don't see any of the configuration options that would affect this. This was on F15 x86_64 if it matters. Thanks, Richard

2011/12/11 Xavier Bachelot <xavier(a)bachelot.org <mailto:xavier@bachelot.org>>: > Hi, > > libbluray has made its first official release a few days ago. The soname was > bumped to 1.0.0 just before the release, in order to make sure it's > incompatible with older snapshots they have produced. The snapshots I've > made and packaged for Fedora are compatible with the release, so Fedora/RPM > Fusion packages should be fine after a simple rebuild. > > I would like to have a clean start with this library and have the updated > package pushed to devel, but also to all currently active releases ( F-16, > F-15 and EL-6), despite the soname breakage. Now that upstream is ready to > push releases, I think it will be easier to keep the package in good shape > if we follow them. > > Affected packages are as follow : > > For F17 and F16 : > gvfs (fedora) > mplayer (rpmfusion-free) > xbmc (rpmfusion-free) > > For F15 : > mplayer (rpmfusion-free) > xbmc (rpmfusion-free) > > EL-6 doesn't have any affected package. Hello Xavier,

Vlc has gained support for libbluray with Rawhide/F-17 so I'm fine with having it updated ASAP. But I expect that can wait for the new snapshot.

For older Fedora releases I'm more doubtful, is there really new features introduced? Can't we consider bluray users in need for a new version to move to f16?