10:27 a.m.
Hi,
I was wondering what is holding up the push process. I did build
gnome-mplayer-0.9.3-2 and gecko-mediaplayer-0.9.3-2 a few days ago, and
they still did not appear in testing. Is this some issue with push
scripts, or just lack of time to fire up the push?
Regards,
Julian
10:50 a.m.
On 12.01.2009 11:27, Julian Sikorski wrote:
I was wondering what is holding up the push process. I did build
gnome-mplayer-0.9.3-2 and gecko-mediaplayer-0.9.3-2 a few days ago, and
they still did not appear in testing. Is this some issue with push
scripts, or just lack of time to fire up the push?
The new xine-lib-extras-nonfree packages (that have a hard dep on the
xine-lib from Fedora that are not pushed yet afaics; I guess they get
out later today/early tomorrow) are in the needsign queue (there was a
mail about it a few days ago on this list). Hence if I want to do a RPM
Fusion Free push without them then I need to either
(1) move xine-lib-extras-nonfree out of the needsign repo, push, move
back, recreate repodata for needsign (the latter is not needed for
xine-lib-extras-nonfree, but for things like ffmpeg, as other thigns
might need it as BR) -- error prone and a bit more work than usually
(2) Push the package kind of manually with the individual scripts from
the push script one of the other -- less error prone than (1), but a bit
more work than (1)
(Mschwendt might correct me if there are more/better ways.)
I can do one of the above (did (1) a few times already in the past) if
there are good reasons to. Are there?
CU
knurd
11:12 a.m.
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:50:41 +0100, Thorsten wrote:
On 12.01.2009 11:27, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>
> I was wondering what is holding up the push process. I did build
> gnome-mplayer-0.9.3-2 and gecko-mediaplayer-0.9.3-2 a few days ago, and
> they still did not appear in testing. Is this some issue with push
> scripts, or just lack of time to fire up the push?
The new xine-lib-extras-nonfree packages (that have a hard dep on the
xine-lib from Fedora that are not pushed yet afaics; I guess they get
out later today/early tomorrow) are in the needsign queue (there was a
mail about it a few days ago on this list). Hence if I want to do a RPM
Fusion Free push without them then I need to either
(1) move xine-lib-extras-nonfree out of the needsign repo, push, move
back, recreate repodata for needsign (the latter is not needed for
xine-lib-extras-nonfree, but for things like ffmpeg, as other thigns
might need it as BR) -- error prone and a bit more work than usually
(2) Push the package kind of manually with the individual scripts from
the push script one of the other -- less error prone than (1), but a bit
more work than (1)
(Mschwendt might correct me if there are more/better ways.)
I can do one of the above (did (1) a few times already in the past) if
there are good reasons to. Are there?
There's still the "blacklist" files, which can exclude packages in
needsign from being pushed [1]:
echo "xine-lib-extras-freeworld" >> rpmfusion_free-10-blacklist.txt
in the pushscript directory. One src.rpm %name per line. FE used these
lists for ignoring packages that create broken deps. Packages will stay in
needsign, however, and are available in the buildroots.
--
[1] The feature could be enhanced to create better filenames, which take
into account the two EPEL/Fedora flavours.
11:39 a.m.
On 12.01.2009 12:12, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:50:41 +0100, Thorsten wrote:
There's still the "blacklist" files, which can exclude packages in
needsign from being pushed [1]:
echo "xine-lib-extras-freeworld" >> rpmfusion_free-10-blacklist.txt
in the pushscript directory. One src.rpm %name per line. FE used these
lists for ignoring packages that create broken deps. Packages will stay in
needsign, however, and are available in the buildroots.
Hah! It all lay there right before my eyes and I didn't see how to use
the file to do what I wanted. Many Thx for the tip!
CU
thl
11:31 a.m.
Thorsten Leemhuis pisze:
On 12.01.2009 11:27, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>
> I was wondering what is holding up the push process. I did build
> gnome-mplayer-0.9.3-2 and gecko-mediaplayer-0.9.3-2 a few days ago, and
> they still did not appear in testing. Is this some issue with push
> scripts, or just lack of time to fire up the push?
The new xine-lib-extras-nonfree packages (that have a hard dep on the
xine-lib from Fedora that are not pushed yet afaics; I guess they get
out later today/early tomorrow) are in the needsign queue (there was a
mail about it a few days ago on this list). Hence if I want to do a RPM
Fusion Free push without them then I need to either
(1) move xine-lib-extras-nonfree out of the needsign repo, push, move
back, recreate repodata for needsign (the latter is not needed for
xine-lib-extras-nonfree, but for things like ffmpeg, as other thigns
might need it as BR) -- error prone and a bit more work than usually
(2) Push the package kind of manually with the individual scripts from
the push script one of the other -- less error prone than (1), but a bit
more work than (1)
(Mschwendt might correct me if there are more/better ways.)
I can do one of the above (did (1) a few times already in the past) if
there are good reasons to. Are there?
CU
knurd
OK, thanks for the explanation. When it comes to gnome-mplayer and
gecko-mediaplayer, the fixes these two contain are pretty trivial so I
guess they can wait for xine.
Regards,
Julian
5794
days inactive
5794
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Julian Sikorski -
Michael Schwendt -
Thorsten Leemhuis