http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528 Zarko Pintar <zarko.pintar(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |529 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528 Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora(a)gmail.com Blocks|2 |3 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-04-17 06:33:14 --- This one is simpler. Here are my notes: * rpmlint: mlt++-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation See below. mlt++.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libmlt++.so.0.3.8 /lib64/libm.so.6 This shouldn't be hard to fix. Please report this upstream. * Group tag for the main package should be System Environment/Libraries * From their contents, it looks like the doc files CUSTOMISING HOWTO README belong to the devel subpackage * The license notes in the header of the files look weird. It is a mixture of GPL and LGPL. Can you ask upstream to clarify this? * I don't think you need this line find ./ -name configure -exec chmod 755 {} \; (You should check for such changes yourself when there is a new release.) * From the installed header files, I can tell that mlt++-devel must require mlt-devel = %{version} * Requires: pkgconfig can be removed. Package does not install a .pc file. * In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} . Is there a reason to have an exception here? ? Shouldn't we build and package what is inside the swig directory? ? How about the test directory? Shall we package it in the %doc of the devel package? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528 --- Comment #4 from Zarko Pintar <zarko.pintar(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-05-18 15:14:27 --- MLT++ source at upstream no longer exist. Now it is a part of MLT source, so this bug must be closed as dead. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528 Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|529 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528 Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hobbes1069(a)gmail.com Blocks|2, 30 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.