http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13
--- Comment #9 from David Timms <dtimms(a)iinet.net.au> 2008-12-07 03:07:17 ---
As I was writing the CVS request and determining to place it in free
or
nonfree, I realized we packaged both in one...
Good point.
Do you agree we should split
this package up into rpmfusion-{free,nonfree}-package-config-smart?
Yes. But I
don't see any reason to not have it generated from the same source
RPM, if that can be done. But is it possible ? (Usually subpackages have
hyphenated trailing names like foo-common, foo-something).
It would be easier for package users to be able to enable the nonfree repo by
just installing a separate rpm. But the smart-gui provides Edit|Channels which
lets the user easily check a box for the nonfree repo if we default it to only
free enabled.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.