http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #1 from Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-02-20 20:39:16 --- (In reply to comment #0) I saw that too and it seems wrong to me. I already asked in fedora-legal-list about this: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-February/msg00024.... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at&gt; 2009-02-20 22:25:32 --- License should say CC-BY-NC-ND instead of CC-BY-ND. But I agree with the sentiment that the offending artwork should simply be replaced, making the program Free Software and eligible for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #5 from Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-02-20 23:33:48 --- (In reply to comment #4) Are there dll's actually used? Is the source code available? You should ask upstream about their license. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #7 from Eric Moret <eric.moret(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-02-24 08:16:51 --- I have updated the package to get rid of those DLLs as they are not used under Linux according to upstream (http://groups.google.com/group/mono-paint-port/browse_thread/thread/ca994...) I just found out that something must be missing from the postun macro as the menu does not get erased after package uninstallation. Any hints? Lastly if someone submits a replacement artwork for the package I would gladly submnit the package to Fedora as I do not see anymore road blocks for its approval. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #9 from Eric Moret <eric.moret(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-02-25 06:58:28 --- (In reply to comment #8) Request below: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/DesignService#Paint.NET_icon_repla... I have updated the package again with a script to generate the tarball from cvs and remove the unlicensed dll -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #11 from Eric Moret <eric.moret(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-02-25 19:07:20 --- SPEC: ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/paintdotnet/paintdotnet.spec SRPM: ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/paintdotnet/paintdotnet-0.1-0.4.63svn.fc10.sr... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #13 from Eric Moret <eric.moret(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-04-03 09:59:31 --- Indeed, I have reorganized my server the links should now be: ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/linux/paintdotnet/paintdotnet.spec ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/linux/paintdotnet/paintdotnet-0.1-0.5.63svn.s... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #15 from Eric Moret <eric.moret(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-04-25 07:24:24 --- Thank you for spending the time reviewing this package. Please see inline below. (In reply to comment #14) Upstream posted its first file on March 25th while this package was submitted in February. I have since moved to using upstream´s release. I would like to think so, there is an open request for icon replacement at the fedora wiki https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/DesignService#Paint.NET_icon_repla... I created a script to extract those icons. It *seems* to me the change to using upstream´s tarball has taken care of this patch therefore I have removed this patch but I do not currently have access to an x86_64 box to test. Prior to including this patch I had also created an upstream bug as seen at the following link: http://code.google.com/p/paint-mono/issues/detail?id=20 ok I had to include this for me to be able to build on CentOS5 which is one of my target systems. What is the workaround there? ok The configure script provided by upstream only supported the above 2 options (has moved to only supporting --prefix now) ok -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #17 from Eric Moret <eric.moret(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-04-27 06:35:35 --- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497766 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #19 from Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-04-28 18:38:20 --- (In reply to comment #18) Nope, not anymore: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_u... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2 |3 AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package- |oget.fedora(a)gmail.com |review(a)rpmfusion.org | --- Comment #21 from Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-05-22 04:45:01 --- As it seems, no one wants to deal with recreating the artwork, so we will have this package here at rpmfusion. * rpmlint says paintdotnet.src: W: invalid-license CC-BY-NC-ND paintdotnet-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license CC-BY-NC-ND paintdotnet-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license CC-BY-NC-ND paintdotnet.x86_64: W: invalid-license CC-BY-NC-ND paintdotnet.x86_64: E: no-binary paintdotnet.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib These can be ignored. However paintdotnet-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package Please disable the debuginfo package. ! Remember that mono is not available on ppc64 for Fedora < 11. So if you want to build paintdotnet on Fedora < 11 you will need to use an ExcludeArch. ! Please explain in the SPEC file as a comment what is MIT, what is CC-BY-NC-ND. * Why does the main package require pkgconfig? Do you mean it for the devel package? ! Please use the %{name} macro consistently. ! BR: mono-winforms seems unnecessary. Package builds without it. * It looks like the main package needs to require hicolor-icon-theme for directory ownership. ? You are supplying an external .desktop file. That's okay. But why are you using "--add-category X-Red-Hat-Extra"? You can manually add this to the .desktop file. * Packages shall not contain duplicate files. Please remove %doc Resources/Files/License.txt Resources/Files/AboutCredits.rtf from the devel package. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #22 from Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-05-22 04:47:37 --- By this, I mean: what part of paintdotnet is MIT, what part is CC-BY-NC-ND? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 Paul Howarth <paul(a)city-fan.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul(a)city-fan.org --- Comment #24 from Paul Howarth <paul(a)city-fan.org&gt; 2009-05-22 10:26:56 --- (In reply to comment #23) The mono packaging guidelines (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono - which admittedly looks out of date) says that mono packages should be arch-specific, and not simply because mono on ppc64 wasn't available at the time they were written. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #26 from Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-05-27 08:12:10 --- (In reply to comment #25) Thanks for the update! %if 0%{?fedora} < 11 || 0%{?rhel} < 5 ExcludeArch: ppc64 %endif I don't think this will work. Suppose you are building for F-11, where %rhel is not defined. Then you will have %if false || true which evaluates to true and ppc64 will get excluded. Replacing || with && should solve the issue. Btw, is mono.ppc64 available now on RHEL5? For instance %{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/256x256/apps/paintdotnet.png I interpret the consistency rule as using %{name} all over the specfile or using paintdotnet all over the specfile. Not a mixture of both. I used to enforce this interpretation in my reviews in the past, but I realized that it is not worth putting it as a blocker. However, I continue to warn packagers about it which is indicated by my "!". I leave it up to you. Okay, makes sense. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #28 from Eric Moret <eric.moret(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-06-04 08:57:51 --- Indeed it does not seem to be. Latest version at: ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/linux/paintdotnet/paintdotnet.spec ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/linux/paintdotnet/paintdotnet-0.1.63-3.fc10.s... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #30 from Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-06-05 04:00:06 --- Also, please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Use_of_common_namespace http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_package_names_packaging_guideline_dr... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #32 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi&gt; 2009-06-05 11:52:11 --- Yes, I'd suggest putting the .pc files into %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/name unless upstream fixes the naming issue. Renaming is also possible, but that breaks compatibility with upstream. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|3 |4 --- Comment #34 from Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-06-17 22:32:37 --- Thanks. But you shouldn't leave the %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/paintdotnet/ directory unowned. If it is okay for everyone I'll approve the package after the above issue resolved. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #36 from Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-06-18 09:34:50 --- Nope. In this case you list some files twice, which is against the guidelines. In the %files section, when you write a directory name without a %dir label, the contents of that directory get packaged already. So in your case you have to use either %dir %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/paintdotnet/ %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/paintdotnet/*.pc or just %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/paintdotnet/ -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #38 from Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-06-18 16:50:59 --- Wrong again. The main package was correct but the devel was not. Now both are incorrect: The main package does not own the files inside %{_libdir}/paintdotnet/ because now you used %dir. The devel package owns the files %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/paintdotnet/*.pc but not the directory %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/paintdotnet/ Please read comment #36 again. Is there something not clear? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #40 from Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-06-18 17:55:34 --- Alright. Packagingwise, evelything seems fine. But I have problems with running this program. 1- Whenever I save a file, the output file has 0 size and hence it is useless. 2- I can't print anything Do these functions work for you? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #42 from Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-06-20 19:42:55 --- Alright, I'm approving the package because the packaging itself is good to go. But I'm not sure if it makes sense to ship this with broken save and print features. Well, you are the one who is gonna deal with the bug reports. -------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (paintdotnet) is APPROVED by oget for rpmfusion-nonfree -------------------------------------------------------------------- You can now follow our guidelines at http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#head-8354059095aca6ccb5494f9dac8815b732... CVS person: this packager is already sponsored in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #44 from Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-06-23 01:14:28 --- Eric, this software is *not* free! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #46 from Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-06-23 09:52:40 --- (In reply to comment #45) I just edited the Configuration and the Contributors pages to give more emphasis to the following text (taken from http://rpmfusion.org/AnnounceRepository): "We have two separate software repositories: * "free" for Open Source Software (as defined by the Fedora Licensing Guidelines) which the Fedora project cannot ship due to other reasons * "nonfree" for redistributable software that is not Open Source Software (as defined by the Fedora Licensing Guidelines); this includes software with publicly available source-code that has "no commercial use"-like restrictions" Because paintdotnet is not wholly licensed under an Open Source License (as defined by the Fedora Licensing Guidelines) it must go to nonfree. HTH, Andrea. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 --- Comment #48 from Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-06-24 10:02:31 --- (In reply to comment #47) Thank you for spotting this. I updated the wiki. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396 Eric Moret <eric.moret(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #50 from Eric Moret <eric.moret(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-07-03 23:51:53 --- Package commited and built for F-11 and devel in the nonfree repository -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.