5:05 p.m.
2012/9/13 Sérgio M. Basto <sergiomb(a)rpmfusion.org>:
Author: sergiomb
...
+BuildRequires: glibc(x86-32) glibc-devel(x86-32) libstdc++(x86-32)
It should probably be enought with glibc-devel(x86-32) and
libstdc++-devel(x86-32)
%changelog
+* Thu Sep 13 2012 Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> - 4.2.0-0.7.RC4
+- Another try to compile with 32-bits suport on x86_64.
What does this 32bit support stands for ? Because usually we copy the
produced binary -libs sub-package from the "native" 32bit tree to the
x86_64 tree.
This is done automatically by the multilib script from the infra side.
Nicolas (kwizart)
10:10 p.m.
New subject: rpms/VirtualBox/F-18 VirtualBox.spec, 1.17, 1.18 vboxweb.service, 1.1, 1.2
On Sex, 2012-09-14 at 19:05 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2012/9/13 Sérgio M. Basto <sergiomb(a)rpmfusion.org>:
> Author: sergiomb
...
> +BuildRequires: glibc(x86-32) glibc-devel(x86-32) libstdc++(x86-32)
It should probably be enought with glibc-devel(x86-32) and
libstdc++-devel(x86-32)
also doesn't work
Error: No Package found for glibc(x86-32)
and
Error: No Package found for glibc-devel(x86-32)
> %changelog
> +* Thu Sep 13 2012 Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> - 4.2.0-0.7.RC4
> +- Another try to compile with 32-bits support on x86_64.
What does this 32bit support stands for ? Because usually we copy the
produced binary -libs sub-package from the "native" 32bit tree to the
x86_64 tree.
This is done automatically by the multilib script from the infra side.
VirtualBox for x86_64 on configure test if have 32-bit support ,
Checking for 32-bit support: OK. (on my mock build).
and we patch the ./configure to not check that because it fails. I just
want remove that patch and let VirtualBox configure him self without
patching, seems to me better and closer to upstream, since it works on
my mock builds.
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
7:32 a.m.
New subject: rpms/VirtualBox/F-18 VirtualBox.spec, 1.17, 1.18 vboxweb.service, 1.1, 1.2
2012/9/15 Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com>:
On Sex, 2012-09-14 at 19:05 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2012/9/13 Sérgio M. Basto <sergiomb(a)rpmfusion.org>:
...
> What does this 32bit support stands for ? Because usually we copy
the
> produced binary -libs sub-package from the "native" 32bit tree to the
> x86_64 tree.
> This is done automatically by the multilib script from the infra side.
VirtualBox for x86_64 on configure test if have 32-bit support ,
Checking for 32-bit support: OK. (on my mock build).
and we patch the ./configure to not check that because it fails. I just
want remove that patch and let VirtualBox configure him self without
patching, seems to me better and closer to upstream, since it works on
my mock builds.
If it's only a test, there is no need to worry, you can create
a
disable 32bit test and submit it upstream.
But you seems to say that there are no 32bit binaries produced
elsewhere ? What this test is useful for ?
Nicolas (kwizart)
8:06 a.m.
New subject: rpms/VirtualBox/F-18 VirtualBox.spec, 1.17, 1.18 vboxweb.service, 1.1, 1.2
On Sáb, 2012-09-15 at 09:32 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2012/9/15 Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com>:
> On Sex, 2012-09-14 at 19:05 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>> 2012/9/13 Sérgio M. Basto <sergiomb(a)rpmfusion.org>:
...
>> What does this 32bit support stands for ? Because usually we copy the
>> produced binary -libs sub-package from the "native" 32bit tree to the
>> x86_64 tree.
>> This is done automatically by the multilib script from the infra side.
>
> VirtualBox for x86_64 on configure test if have 32-bit support ,
> Checking for 32-bit support: OK. (on my mock build).
>
> and we patch the ./configure to not check that because it fails. I just
> want remove that patch and let VirtualBox configure him self without
> patching, seems to me better and closer to upstream, since it works on
> my mock builds.
If it's only a test, there is no need to worry, you can create a
disable 32bit test and submit it upstream.
But you seems to say that there are no 32bit binaries produced
elsewhere ? What this test is useful for ?
Hi, it wasn't easy (for me) update patches to VirtualBox 4.2 , in middle
of the process, some errors occurred about 32bit binaries ...
I'm not worried about it, simple is more simple build the package
without the patch ...
VirtualBox-4.2.0 is out , can I update it on F17 ?
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
5:36 p.m.
New subject: rpms/VirtualBox/F-18 VirtualBox.spec, 1.17, 1.18 vboxweb.service, 1.1, 1.2
2012/9/16 Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com>:
On Sáb, 2012-09-15 at 09:32 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2012/9/15 Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com>:
> > On Sex, 2012-09-14 at 19:05 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> >> 2012/9/13 Sérgio M. Basto <sergiomb(a)rpmfusion.org>:
> ...
> >> What does this 32bit support stands for ? Because usually we copy the
> >> produced binary -libs sub-package from the "native" 32bit tree to
the
> >> x86_64 tree.
> >> This is done automatically by the multilib script from the infra side.
> >
> > VirtualBox for x86_64 on configure test if have 32-bit support ,
> > Checking for 32-bit support: OK. (on my mock build).
> >
> > and we patch the ./configure to not check that because it fails. I just
> > want remove that patch and let VirtualBox configure him self without
> > patching, seems to me better and closer to upstream, since it works on
> > my mock builds.
> If it's only a test, there is no need to worry, you can create a
> disable 32bit test and submit it upstream.
> But you seems to say that there are no 32bit binaries produced
> elsewhere ? What this test is useful for ?
Hi, it wasn't easy (for me) update patches to VirtualBox 4.2 , in middle
of the process, some errors occurred about 32bit binaries ...
I'm not worried about it, simple is more simple build the package
without the patch ...
VirtualBox-4.2.0 is out , can I update it on F17 ?
That's up to you. I
haven't used it yet.
BTW have you seen this ?
http://fedora-os.org/2012/09/13/workaround-for-vbox-modules-loading/
Nicolas (kwizart)
4457
days inactive
4459
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
4 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Nicolas Chauvet -
Sérgio Basto