5:01 p.m.
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
Summary: Review request: deadbeef-0.5.1 - A music player with
*.cue support
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
URL: http://http://deadbeef.sourceforge.net/
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: nomad71st(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2,30
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Hi!
Full URLs to the spec file and source rpm of the package:
Spec url:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/deadbeef/files/fedora/0.4.4/deadbeef.spec...
Src rpm url:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/deadbeef/files/fedora/0.4.4/deadbeef-0.4....
----------
A short description for the package:
DeaDBeeF (as in 0xDEADBEEF) is an audio player for GNU/Linux systems with X11
(though now it also runs in plain console without X, in FreeBSD, and in
OpenSolaris).
It is mainly written by Alexey Yakovenko, with contributions from a lot of
different people
(see about box in the player for more details).
It is distributed under the terms of General Public License version 2.
----------
Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora:
Package requires libmad.
----------
The output rpmlint gives on both the source and binary packages. Explain for
each message why you've chosen to ignore it:
rpmlint deadbeef-0.5.1-1.fc15.src.rpm
deadbeef.src: E: description-line-too-long C (though now it also runs in plain
console without X, in FreeBSD, and in OpenSolaris).
rpmlint deadbeef-0.5.1-1.fc15.i686.rpm
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency alsa-lib
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency imlib2
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libX11
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libcddb
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libcdio
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libcurl
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libmad
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libmms
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libogg
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libsamplerate
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libsndfile
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libvorbis
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libzip
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency pulseaudio-libs
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency zlib
deadbeef.i686: E: description-line-too-long C (though now it also runs in plain
console without X, in FreeBSD, and in OpenSolaris).
deadbeef.i686: E: description-line-too-long C It is mainly written by Alexey
Yakovenko, with contributions from a lot of different people
deadbeef.i686: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog Yakovenko ['0.5.1-1.fc15',
'0.5.1-1']
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/sndfile.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/supereq.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/wavpack.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/vfs_zip.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/vorbis.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/deadbeef/ddb_gui_GTK2.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/pulse.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/musepack.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/mms.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/deadbeef/dsp_libsrc.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/ffmpeg.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/tta.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/converter.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/hotkeys.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/flac.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/cdda.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/adplug.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/vtx.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/lastfm.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/nullout.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/alsa.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/mpgmad.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/oss.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/include/deadbeef/deadbeef.h
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/notify.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/artwork.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/include/deadbeef/gtkui_api.h
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/gme.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/dca.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/deadbeef/converter_gtkui.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/vfs_curl.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/ffap.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/shellexec.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/wildmidi.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/aac.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/sid.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/m3u.a
deadbeef.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary deadbeef
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/be/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/bg/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/bn/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/ca/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/da/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/el/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/en_GB/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/fa/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/gl/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/he/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/hr/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/hu/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/id/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/kk/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/km/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/lg/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/pt/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/sr/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/sr(a)latin/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/tr/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/uk/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/vi/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/deadbeef.desktop
file contains group "Play Shortcut Group", but groups extending the format
should start with "X-"
deadbeef.i686: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/deadbeef.desktop
file contains group "Pause Shortcut Group", but groups extending the format
should start with "X-"
deadbeef.i686: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/deadbeef.desktop
file contains group "Stop Shortcut Group", but groups extending the format
should start with "X-"
deadbeef.i686: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/deadbeef.desktop
file contains group "Next Shortcut Group", but groups extending the format
should start with "X-"
deadbeef.i686: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/deadbeef.desktop
file contains group "Prev Shortcut Group", but groups xtending the format
should start with "X-"
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 22 errors, 74 warnings.
Really don't know what i should do with them.
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency alsa-lib
without this - plugins won't be build,
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
what does this really means? I made some search on subject - bud didn't find
anything
deadbeef.i686: E: invalid-desktopfil
really don't know what i should do with it -(
----------
Mention if this is your first RPM Fusion package: Yup, thats my first RPM
Fusion package.
----------
Also, i am seeking sponsor.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
10:46 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef-0.5.1 - A music player with *.cue support
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
Xavier Bachelot <xavier(a)bachelot.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |xavier(a)bachelot.org
--- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot <xavier(a)bachelot.org> 2011-06-30 00:46:35 ---
I'm not a sponsor but I can try to help with the first steps of the review. RPM
Fusion packages are subject to the same packaging guidelines as Fedora, so
please make sure to take a look at them. It'll explain a lot of what you need
to do with the below rpmlint warnings.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
rpmlint deadbeef-0.5.1-1.fc15.i686.rpm
rpmlint should be run on the SRPM too. This will list some more things to fix
in the spec, but let's start with what you listed first.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Use_rpmlint
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency alsa-lib
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency imlib2
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libX11
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libcddb
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libcdio
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libcurl
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libmad
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libmms
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libogg
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libsamplerate
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libsndfile
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libvorbis
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libzip
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency pulseaudio-libs
deadbeef.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency zlib
You don't need to require the libs, they will be autodetected at build time and
the proper requires added automatically.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Explicit_Requires
deadbeef.i686: E: description-line-too-long C (though now it also
runs in plain
console without X, in FreeBSD, and in OpenSolaris).
deadbeef.i686: E: description-line-too-long C It is mainly written by Alexey
Yakovenko, with contributions from a lot of different people
The lines in the description should not have more than 80 characters.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Summary_and_description
deadbeef.i686: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog Yakovenko
['0.5.1-1.fc15',
'0.5.1-1']
Please add the version and release to all changelog entries.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/deadbeef/sndfile.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/supereq.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/wavpack.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/vfs_zip.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/vorbis.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/deadbeef/ddb_gui_GTK2.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/pulse.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/musepack.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/mms.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/deadbeef/dsp_libsrc.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/ffmpeg.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/tta.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/converter.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/hotkeys.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/flac.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/cdda.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/adplug.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/vtx.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/lastfm.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/nullout.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/alsa.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/mpgmad.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/oss.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/include/deadbeef/deadbeef.h
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/notify.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/artwork.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/include/deadbeef/gtkui_api.h
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/gme.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/dca.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/deadbeef/converter_gtkui.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/vfs_curl.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/ffap.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/shellexec.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/wildmidi.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/aac.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/sid.a
deadbeef.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/deadbeef/m3u.a
You should not package static files. Even better, you should not even build
them. so either delete them or add --disable-static to the configure
invocation.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libr...
deadbeef.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary deadbeef
Harmless, but as it seems you are upstream, you can probably easily add a man
page.
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/be/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/bg/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/bn/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/ca/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/da/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/el/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/en_GB/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/fa/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/gl/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/he/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/hr/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/hu/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/id/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/kk/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/km/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/lg/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/pt/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/sr/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/sr(a)latin/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/tr/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/uk/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/vi/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
deadbeef.i686: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/deadbeef.mo
Locales files should be marked as such.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files
deadbeef.i686: E: invalid-desktopfile
/usr/share/applications/deadbeef.desktop
file contains group "Play Shortcut Group", but groups extending the format
should start with "X-"
deadbeef.i686: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/deadbeef.desktop
file contains group "Pause Shortcut Group", but groups extending the format
should start with "X-"
deadbeef.i686: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/deadbeef.desktop
file contains group "Stop Shortcut Group", but groups extending the format
should start with "X-"
deadbeef.i686: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/deadbeef.desktop
file contains group "Next Shortcut Group", but groups extending the format
should start with "X-"
deadbeef.i686: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/deadbeef.desktop
file contains group "Prev Shortcut Group", but groups xtending the format
should start with "X-"
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files
Read the guidelines and fix all of the above issues, that should be a good
starting point, then run rpmlint again on both the binary rpm and the source
rpm. Again, fix as much as you can, then post links to the updated versions of
the spec and srpm.
Hope this helps,
Xavier
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
12:04 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef-0.5.1 - A music player with *.cue support
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
--- Comment #2 from Alexey Komissarov <nomad71st(a)gmail.com> 2011-07-01 14:04:45
---
Thank you for your reply Xavier!
I followed instuctions and thereis practically no erros left.
rpmlint deadbeef-0.5.1-1.fc15.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings
rpmlint deadbeef-0.5.1-1.fc15.i686.rpm
deadbeef.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary deadbeef
deadbeef.i686: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/deadbeef.desktop
file contains group "Play Shortcut Group", but groups extending the format
should start with "X-"
deadbeef.i686: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/deadbeef.desktop
file contains group "Pause Shortcut Group", but groups extending the format
should start with "X-"
deadbeef.i686: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/deadbeef.desktop
file contains group "Stop Shortcut Group", but groups extending the format
should start with "X-"
deadbeef.i686: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/deadbeef.desktop
file contains group "Next Shortcut Group", but groups extending the format
should start with "X-"
deadbeef.i686: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/deadbeef.desktop
file contains group "Prev Shortcut Group", but groups extending the format
should start with "X-"
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 1 warnings.
no-manual-page-for-binary deadbeef
Left because I think threis
no need in manual for musoc player (What even can
be in manual for player with GUI?)
deadbeef.i686: E: invalid-desktopfile
/usr/share/applications/deadbeef.desktop > file contains group "Play Shortcut
Group", but groups extending the format
should start with "X-"
Left because I don't know how to apply patch when building rpms with mock (Or i
should build it with rpmbuild?)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
12:05 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef-0.5.1 - A music player with *.cue support
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
--- Comment #3 from Alexey Komissarov <nomad71st(a)gmail.com> 2011-07-01 14:05:30
---
Created an attachment (id=659)
--> (http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=659)
new version of deadbeef spec file
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
1:35 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef-0.5.1 - A music player with *.cue support
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
David Timms <dtimms(a)iinet.net.au> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dtimms(a)iinet.net.au
--- Comment #4 from David Timms <dtimms(a)iinet.net.au> 2011-07-01 15:35:08 ---
Some things to fix:
whitespace: spec should use white space consistently.
- This means always use space or always tab for indentation.
- Also, remove trailing spaces and tabs from all lines.
- Looking at other specs, you'll notice that %files section do not have the
lines indented.
- take a look at the spec with an editor that can show whitespace:
yum install meld
meld deadbeef.spec.orig deadbeef.spec
- I think we are supposed to avoid ".la droppings" (see the fedora guidelines),
and hence shouldn't be packaging them.
- an rpm spec changelog should indicate changes only to the packaging, not to
the upstream application/program. It also has a standard no indent format, and
requires the change author's email.
eg: (from guidelines, 1 of 3 acceptable formats):
* Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)redhat.com> - 0.6-4
- fix the link syntax.
- moved .h devel files to -devel package.
- updated to upstream release 0.6.
- the upstream changelog lines could be included in a separate changelog file
that gests installed as part of the install.
- the sourceurl must point to a direct download. sourceforge files have such a
url that is required to be used.
- the warnings with desktop files do need to be taken care of. They don't
appear to be in the %files list, and they are using invalid group. It doesn't
look like desktop-file-install is being used.
- reduce lines to 80 chars max to assist readability.
- add multiple BuildRequires/Requires lines, with preferably one, and at most a
few related items, rather than placing all items on the same line.
- also, you shouldn't add requires that rpmbuild picks up automatically (try to
mock build without them to see if rpms succeeds).
- %{_defaultdocdir}/ items should probably be %doc
- %files: you can add a directory, and it will include all files and subdirs
- are any the libs (.so) duplicates of fedora/rpm fusion supplied libs ?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8:28 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef-0.5.1 - A music player with *.cue support
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
--- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)gmail.com> 2011-07-02 22:28:47 ---
- are any the libs (.so) duplicates of fedora/rpm fusion supplied
libs ?
Even if they were, currently they are stored in %{_libdir}/deadbeef/ which is
a private path outside run-time linker's search path.
The packaging suffers from several
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories
e.g.
%{_defaultdocdir}/deadbeef/
%{_datadir}/deadbeef/
%{_datadir}/deadbeef/pixmaps/
%{_libdir}/deadbeef/
%{_includedir}/deadbeef/
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8:34 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef-0.5.1 - A music player with *.cue support
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
--- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)gmail.com> 2011-07-02 22:34:15 ---
However, with regard to unbundling system libs, the tarball includes several
libraries in its "plugins" subdir. Ouch.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5:51 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef-0.5.1 - A music player with *.cue support
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
--- Comment #7 from Alexey Komissarov <nomad71st(a)gmail.com> 2011-07-03 19:51:34
---
I hope i fixed all mentioned errors...
As for rpmlint only errors about manual and desktop icons lefs, as was
mentioned before.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
6:03 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef-0.5.1 - A music player with *.cue support
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
--- Comment #8 from Alexey Komissarov <nomad71st(a)gmail.com> 2011-07-03 20:03:16
---
Created an attachment (id=660)
--> (http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=660)
spec file 03.07.2011
%{_libdir}/deadbeef/aac.so
%{_libdir}/deadbeef/aac.so.0
%{_libdir}/deadbeef/aac.so.0.0.0
Please tell me, if this lines should be change to
something like
%{_libdir}/deadbeef/*
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
6:32 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef-0.5.1 - A music player with *.cue support
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
--- Comment #9 from Xavier Bachelot <xavier(a)bachelot.org> 2011-07-03 20:32:54 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> %{_libdir}/deadbeef/aac.so
> %{_libdir}/deadbeef/aac.so.0
> %{_libdir}/deadbeef/aac.so.0.0.0
Please tell me, if this lines should be change to something like
> %{_libdir}/deadbeef/*
No this would left the %{_libdir}/deadbeef directory unowned.
The below line will match the directory and everything below it :
%{_libdir}/deadbeef
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
6:57 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef-0.5.1 - A music player with *.cue support
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
--- Comment #10 from Alexey Komissarov <nomad71st(a)gmail.com> 2011-07-03 20:57:22
---
Created an attachment (id=661)
--> (http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=661)
spec file 03.07.2011 v2
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
> > %{_libdir}/deadbeef/aac.so
> > %{_libdir}/deadbeef/aac.so.0
> > %{_libdir}/deadbeef/aac.so.0.0.0
> Please tell me, if this lines should be change to something like
> > %{_libdir}/deadbeef/*
>
No this would left the %{_libdir}/deadbeef directory unowned.
The below line will match the directory and everything below it :
%{_libdir}/deadbeef
Thank you, now it is much more smaller.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7:10 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef-0.5.1 - A music player with *.cue support
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
--- Comment #11 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)gmail.com> 2011-07-03 21:10:02
---
Smaller but no correct yet.
%{_defaultdocdir}/deadbeef
%exclude %{_defaultdocdir}/deadbeef/*
What are these two lines supposed to achieve?
Sometimes comments in the spec file could do wonders. ;)
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
As pointed out before, these two are not needed, because the package doesn't
store any library in run-timer linker's search path.
%{_datadir}/applications/deadbeef.desktop
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop
Notice section "desktop-file-install usage".
%{_datadir}/deadbeef
%{_libdir}/deadbeef
Note that spec files are much more comprehensible, if you add a trailing slash
to directories to distinguish them from single files. E.g.
%{_datadir}/deadbeef/
%{_libdir}/deadbeef/
but:
%{_bindir}/deadbeef
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
11:38 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef-0.5.1 - A music player with *.cue support
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
Alexey Komissarov <nomad71st(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #659 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
Attachment #660 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
Attachment #661 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
--- Comment #12 from Alexey Komissarov <nomad71st(a)gmail.com> 2011-07-04 13:38:45
---
Created an attachment (id=662)
--> (http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=662)
spec file 04.07.2011
I hope i fexed all the issues
rpmlint
/var/lib/mock/fedora-15-i386/result/deadbeef-0.5.1-1.fc15.i686.rpm
> deadbeef.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary deadbeef
> 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
[build@f14 ~]$ rpmlint
/var/lib/mock/fedora-15-i386/result/deadbeef-0.5.1-1.fc15.src.rpm
> 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
3:33 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef-0.5.1 - A music player with *.cue support
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
Alexey Komissarov <nomad71st(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #662 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
--- Comment #13 from Alexey Komissarov <nomad71st(a)gmail.com> 2011-07-04 17:33:51
---
Created an attachment (id=663)
--> (http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=663)
spec
Some more fixes and new errors from rpmlint
rpmlint deadbeef-0.5.1-1.fc15.i686.rpm
> deadbeef.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xing -> zing, axing, sing
> deadbeef.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sid -> seed, dis, Sid
> deadbeef.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US chiptune -> chip tune,
chip-tune, chipmunk
> deadbeef.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xm -> cm, x, m
> deadbeef.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xbindkeys -> monkeyshine
> deadbeef.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fm -> FM, Fm, gm
> deadbeef.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scrobbler -> scribbler,
scrabbler
> deadbeef.i686: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.5.1-2 ['0.5.1-1.fc15',
'0.5.1-1']
> deadbeef.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary deadbeef
> 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings.
[build@f14 ~]$ rpmlint deadbeef-0.5.1-1.fc15.src.rpm
> deadbeef.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xing -> zing, axing, sing
> deadbeef.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sid -> seed, dis, Sid
> deadbeef.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US chiptune -> chip tune,
chip-tune, chipmunk
> deadbeef.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xm -> cm, x, m
> deadbeef.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xbindkeys -> monkeyshine
> deadbeef.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fm -> FM, Fm, gm
> deadbeef.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scrobbler -> scribbler,
scrabbler
> deadbeef.src:126: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 118, tab: line 126)
> 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
4:07 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef-0.5.1 - A music player with *.cue support
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
Christoph Wickert <cwickert(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |cwickert(a)fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #14 from Christoph Wickert <cwickert(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-07-04
18:07:54 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
However, with regard to unbundling system libs, the tarball includes
several
libraries in its "plugins" subdir. Ouch.
I packaged deadbeef a while back and thought about submitting if here, but the
bundled libraries are definitely a blocker. I talked to upstream about this
issue and he said that it won't change:
> You are bundling a lot of libraries. This is forbidden in
Fedora
> [1]. Is there a way to build against the system's versions of
> the libraries? Remmina for example has has a configure parameter
> --enable-vnc=dl for this.
no. most of the bundled libraries have been heavily modified, for
better performance (e.g. not using stl in adplug and libsidplay2), to
make them reentrant (many libs only worked in single-instance mode,
which is not enough for my needs), to have less dependencies (e.g.
removed glib dependency from libmms), to be compatible with more
architectures and operating systems (arm, powerpc / android, bsd,
solaris), etc.
> I don't want to maintain a package where I need to patch the
> Makefiles for every new release. Perhaps you can think of an
> easy way to fix this in the next deadbeef release.
i don't see how is that possible, sorry.
This being said I doubt this can go into rpmfusion.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
9:46 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef-0.5.1 - A music player with *.cue support
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
--- Comment #15 from David Timms <dtimms(a)iinet.net.au> 2011-07-04 23:45:58 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
Some more fixes and new errors from rpmlint
>> deadbeef.i686: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.5.1-2
['0.5.1-1.fc15', '0.5.1-1']
This indicates that the spec version/release was bumped, but it does not match
the latest changelog entry. Remember, changelog indicates what changed with the
package, rather than the upstream source, and hence must be added to for each
change you make to the spec.
>> deadbeef.src:126: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces:
line 118, tab: line 126)
Easy fix ;-) tells you what line the problem is. Take a
look with an editor
that shows whitespace as visible chars (eg like meld).
Regarding bundled libraries:
If you have a think about the way the source code works, do you think it would
be possible to include certain make/build parameters to the build environment
that would allow a packager to choose whether to use bundled or system
libraries ?
This would allow a custom build to include the bundled version, while the
Fedora (and other distro) packaging can use the system libraries.
Michael might be able to make more suggestions of how to go about it (I do not
have experience in this area).
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
6:07 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef-0.5.1 - A music player with *.cue support
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
Alexey Komissarov <nomad71st(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #663 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
--- Comment #16 from Alexey Komissarov <nomad71st(a)gmail.com> 2011-07-05 08:07:45
---
Created an attachment (id=664)
--> (http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=664)
spec file
Regarding bundled libraries:
If you have a think about the way the source code works, do you think it would
be possible to include certain make/build parameters to the build environment
that would allow a packager to choose whether to use bundled or system
libraries ?
This would allow a custom build to include the bundled version, while
the
Fedora (and other distro) packaging can use the system libraries.
Michael might be able to make more suggestions of how to go about it
(I do not
have experience in this area).
Fixed small errors about version and spaces.
I don't have an idea how to modify makefiles. Is this is only way to get it
into rpmfusion repo?
And why it can't be used with it's own libraries if they were optimized for
perfomance or something else? As for me, users don't care which libraries are
currently in use while everything works fine.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7:26 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef-0.5.1 - A music player with *.cue support
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
--- Comment #17 from Xavier Bachelot <xavier(a)bachelot.org> 2011-07-05 09:26:40 ---
And why it can't be used with it's own libraries if they were
optimized for
perfomance or something else? As for me, users don't care which libraries are
currently in use while everything works fine.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
3:34 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef-0.5.1 - A music player with *.cue support
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
--- Comment #18 from Christoph Wickert <cwickert(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-07-05
17:34:35 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
Regarding bundled libraries:
If you have a think about the way the source code works, do you think it would
be possible to include certain make/build parameters to the build environment
that would allow a packager to choose whether to use bundled or system
libraries ?
Perhaps I or the paragraph I quote from upstream was not clear enough. Just
modifying the Makefiles is not enough because the bundled copies of the
libraries are changed in a way that will most likely make building against the
shared system libs fail. You can give it a try but I am not overly optimistic
that it will work.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5:25 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef-0.5.1 - A music player with *.cue support
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
--- Comment #19 from Alexey Komissarov <nomad71st(a)gmail.com> 2011-07-05 19:25:34
---
(In reply to comment #18)
Perhaps I or the paragraph I quote from upstream was not clear
enough. Just
modifying the Makefiles is not enough because the bundled copies of the
libraries are changed in a way that will most likely make building against the
shared system libs fail. You can give it a try but I am not overly optimistic
that it will work.
This is very sad.
I have one question: was found that rpm build with this spec file provides 2
directories in /usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/deadbeef/ (emty one)
and
/usr/share/doc/deadbeef-0.5.1 with docs.
How it can be fixed? Should I add something like
rmdir /usr/share/doc/deadbeef/
to the %post section of my spec file?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5:42 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef - A music player with *.cue support
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kwizart(a)gmail.com
Summary|Review request: deadbeef- |Review request: deadbeef - A
|0.5.1 - A music player with|music player with *.cue
|*.cue support |support
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5:47 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef - A music player with cue sheet support
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Review request: deadbeef - A|Review request: deadbeef - A
|music player with *.cue |music player with cue sheet
|support |support
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
3:15 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef - A music player with cue sheet support
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
Alexey Komissarov <nomad71st(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #664 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
--- Comment #20 from Alexey Komissarov <nomad71st(a)gmail.com> 2011-07-09 17:15:38
---
Created an attachment (id=665)
--> (http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=665)
spec
New spec file, problem with 2 doc dirs solved
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
6:14 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef - A music player with cue sheet support
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hobbes1069(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #21 from Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> 2011-10-06 20:14:49 ---
Some comments on the spec file:
1. BuildRoot:, "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" can be removed from %install, %clean
can be removed entirely, and "%defattr(-,root,root)" can be removed from %files
unless your building for EL5.
2. In you devel subpackage the Require: should probably be arch dependent:
Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
to
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
3. Modifying the desktop file in %prep is odd. desktop-file-install can modify
desktop files on the fly, so if it's capable of removing the Unity parts then I
would use it instead. Just research it's options.
If desktop-file-install is not capable of making the needed edits and you still
need to resort to sed then at least move it to just above your
desktop-file-install command.
Also, currently you're not modifying anything in the desktop file by the time
you get to desktop-file-install so you could use desktop-file-validate instead.
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#desktop-file-install_u...
4. Ok, you definitely took Michael's comments to heart, but perhaps went a
little too far :)
I would only add comments in %files for unusual situations. You can drop #doc,
# Files, and # Dirs.
5. %{_defaultdocdir} can just be %{_docdir}
6. In the case of the extra doc directory there's no hard rule for this that I
know of but it's my opinion that %exclude use in %files should be limited to
excluding files from one package so they can be included in a sub-package.
For instance, you might run into a situation where it would be difficult or
overly verbose to work around files that you really want to go into a -devel or
-doc subpackage. Here %exclude could be used to exclude files or directors in
the main package so they can be included in -doc or -devel.
If you're not going to include files in a package at all then it's better to
just remove them in %install like you're already doing for .la files.
For the static libraries (.a) I would just remove them if there's nothing that
actually needs them. If you need them then they should go in a -static
subpackage not in -devel.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
10:29 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef - A music player with cue sheet support
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
--- Comment #22 from starws <vsncnnz4(a)gmail.com> 2011-10-18 12:29:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=733)
--> (http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=733)
deadbeef spec file
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
10:31 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1829] Review request: deadbeef - A music player with cue sheet support
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829
starws <vsncnnz4(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |vsncnnz4(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #23 from starws <vsncnnz4(a)gmail.com> 2011-10-18 12:31:11 ---
(In reply to comment #21)
1.
fixed
2.
devel subpackage is arch independent
3.
seems like desktop-file-install can't help
4.
fixed
5.
fixed
6.
%exclude %{_docdir} here is an upstream configure script bug
workaround, I hope
it will be fixed in the next release
.a files removed
New spec file in attachments
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
4814
days inactive
4926
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
25 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
RPM Fusion Bugzilla