http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449 NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449 --- Comment #2 from NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-03-19 12:06:11 --- That was explained on the mailing list and on this review. About ffmpeg, this package does require it to work,( along with a vdpau backend implementation and capable hardware). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449 --- Comment #4 from NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-06-05 10:10:11 --- You have to understand that if you do not understand, then that's "something" that you do not understand, but you can understand few things at least... So please ask a more accurate question... I've already answeared to the first one. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449 --- Comment #6 from NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt; 2009-06-05 20:55:31 --- That's the other way, (as XvMC) . A vdpau capable player (mythtv xine-ui mplayer XBMC, etc) need to link to vdpau and a vdpau enabled ffmpeg (see #531 ). that's the open source (free) side of things. (hence , totally possible for us to redistribute). Now for any end users to use the vdpau output, there is a need for capable hardware (GeForce >= 8xxx) and the related "binary only" driver. that can be installed at runtime. this vdpau wrapper library will then dlopen the vdpau backend library. (again, same as XvMC) There is a very close relation beetween the vdpau wrapper library (this package review), that provides a given vdpau API, and the API that the binary driver support. Now, despite XvMC, vdpau doesn't have a free implementation. So any fedora reviewer could say it has failed the usability test... So this is all a matter of decision... At least it could exist a vdpau opensource implementation... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449 --- Comment #8 from Jarod Wilson <jarod(a)wilsonet.com&gt; 2009-09-04 20:14:48 --- It was finally decided upon in today's Fedora Engineering Steering Committee meeting that libvdpau is considered acceptable for inclusion in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449 Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hobbes1069(a)gmail.com Blocks|2 | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.