8:14 p.m.
Dear all,
I have realised that I have not been giving bsnes the love it deserves.
The current version in the repos is severely lagging behind upstream
release, and I have no energy to update it due to some massive changes.
I am attaching the latest spec (building on f14 but install section
needs tweaking). How should I proceed next?
Julian
8:23 p.m.
2011/6/15 Julian Sikorski <belegdol(a)gmail.com>:
Dear all,
I have realised that I have not been giving bsnes the love it deserves.
The current version in the repos is severely lagging behind upstream
release, and I have no energy to update it due to some massive changes.
I am attaching the latest spec (building on f14 but install section
needs tweaking). How should I proceed next?
Julian
Hi,
You need to follow the same process as it used to be in fedora:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Deprecate_orphaned_packages#CVS
Basically, remove all files related to the module in devel (not
current branches)
and put a dead.package that explain why this module is orphaned.
But we could wait a little for another maintainer to rise before that.
Thx
Nicolas (kwizart)
8:34 p.m.
W dniu 15.06.2011 22:23, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
2011/6/15 Julian Sikorski <belegdol(a)gmail.com>:
> Dear all,
>
> I have realised that I have not been giving bsnes the love it deserves.
> The current version in the repos is severely lagging behind upstream
> release, and I have no energy to update it due to some massive changes.
> I am attaching the latest spec (building on f14 but install section
> needs tweaking). How should I proceed next?
>
> Julian
>
Hi,
You need to follow the same process as it used to be in fedora:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Deprecate_orphaned_packages#CVS
Basically, remove all files related to the module in devel (not
current branches)
and put a dead.package that explain why this module is orphaned.
But we could wait a little for another maintainer to rise before that.
Thx
Nicolas (kwizart)
Thanks for the info Nicolas. I haven't been following bsnes development
lately, but it seems upstream has focused on the core emulation aspect,
leaving UI to third parties (some UI still seems to be there though).
IIRC mednafen development packages include bsnes. Other frontend is ssnes.
Just writing it up so that the prospective maintainers knows what are
they getting themselves into.
Julian
9:21 a.m.
On 16/06/11 06:34, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 15.06.2011 22:23, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
> 2011/6/15 Julian Sikorski<belegdol(a)gmail.com>:
>> I have realised that I have not been giving bsnes the love it deserves.
I've pricked up my ears, but reality tells me I won't have much linux
time until September in any case.
So, would you recommend another snes emu, ie since it is more complete,
or more realistic, and so on, or is this one of the best ?
9:54 p.m.
W dniu 20.06.2011 11:21, David Timms pisze:
On 16/06/11 06:34, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 15.06.2011 22:23, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
>> 2011/6/15 Julian
>> Sikorski<belegdol(a)gmail.com>:
>>> I have realised that I have not been giving bsnes the love it deserves.
I've pricked up my ears, but reality tells me I won't have much linux
time until September in any case.
So, would you recommend another snes emu, ie since it is more complete,
or more realistic, and so on, or is this one of the best ?
When it comes to accuracy this is as good as it gets. mednafen in
-testing contains bsnes, but this is older than what we have in repos
anyway. I will try to push one final update so that the new maintainer
has a better start.
Julian
8:08 p.m.
W dniu 20.06.2011 23:54, Julian Sikorski pisze:
W dniu 20.06.2011 11:21, David Timms pisze:
> On 16/06/11 06:34, Julian Sikorski wrote:
>> W dniu 15.06.2011 22:23, Nicolas Chauvet pisze:
>>> 2011/6/15 Julian
>>> Sikorski<belegdol(a)gmail.com>:
>>>> I have realised that I have not been giving bsnes the love it deserves.
>
> I've pricked up my ears, but reality tells me I won't have much linux
> time until September in any case.
>
> So, would you recommend another snes emu, ie since it is more complete,
> or more realistic, and so on, or is this one of the best ?
>
When it comes to accuracy this is as good as it gets. mednafen in
-testing contains bsnes, but this is older than what we have in repos
anyway. I will try to push one final update so that the new maintainer
has a better start.
Julian
OK, I have managed to beat bsnes package into somewhat reasonable shape.
As such, I won't be orphaning it yet, at least not until you have time
to take it over.
Julian
4937
days inactive
4944
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Agnes Jones -
Julian Sikorski -
Nicolas Chauvet