Xavier Bachelot venit, vidit, dixit 10.07.2013 10:58: > Hi, > > On 01/05/2012 08:56 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> The following packages currently depend on xine-lib: >> * gxine >> * (k9copy – already in RPM Fusion, not affected) >> * kaffeine (my package, the reason why I maintain xine-lib in the first place) >> * oxine >> * xine-plugin >> * xine-ui >> These packages would have to move to RPM Fusion along with xine-lib. > > Fwiw, I've rebuilt all the above packages (but k9copy, not tested yet) > against the xine-lib 1.2.3 rpm I prepared and all the builds succeeded. > No runtime tests yet. > > Would all the impacted maintainers be ok to move their package to RPM > Fusion, alongside with xine-lib 1.2 ? Yes, more than happy.

I assume that packages such as xine-ui would be subsumed in other packages then?

I'd pass over maintainership to the corresponding superpackage maintainer then. Michael