Folks, A question about some possible future changes to my OpenAFS packages. Many folks that use/admin OpenAFS prefer the older paths (to configuration/binaries) used by Transarc. (The company that developed and sold AFS that spun off from Carnegie Mellon University.) These paths are not FHS compliant. Specifically, /usr/vice and /usr/afs. Possibly /usr/afsws as well, but that seems deprecated by the OpenAFS folks. Would a sub-package providing symlinks to make some of the above paths valid be acceptable in RPMFusion? Perhaps, openafs-transarc. Jack -- Jack Neely <jjneely(a)ncsu.edu&gt; Linux Czar, OIT Campus Linux Services Office of Information Technology, NC State University GPG Fingerprint: 1917 5AC1 E828 9337 7AA4 EA6B 213B 765F 3B6A 5B89